|
Well I don't vote but if I did...
Kerry because he's not Bush.
Bush has had his 4 years in office and he's done a lot with them. Everything he did do is very controversial and theres nothing everyone can agree on that yes he did that very well. I think the only Presidents that should get reelected are the ones everyone (or a clear majority) agrees did a very good job.
So yank Bush out, shake his hand, and put Kerry in. Maybe Kerry will fuck up, if he does we'll try someone else next election. Couldnt be any worse than Bush.
-=-=-=-==--==-
| quote: | Originally posted by tribu
Unless youre in my situation where you would vote for neither Kerry nor Bush. Ive made this post before, and Im not going through the argument again, but you would never catch me voting for either.
Bush: Hasnt been a terrible president. Its tough to follow up the Internet boom which made Clinton's reign special. But the Iraq war has looked terrible for USA internationally, the post-war has been nothing but a debacle and his character seems leeched from the popular TV shows of his era.
Kerry: The classic political flip-flopper. Just like Clinton, Kerry runs his candidacy on public opinion polls, and without a similar economic boom he seems doomed to be a one-term lame duck. The guy (or rather, his advisors) has a great plan for health care, but just like Bush, all he wants to do is spend spend spend.
In short, the Republican and Democratic candidates will squander our tax money on projects meant to either build their legacy or assure their re-election respectively. If you dont support these ideals, why would you vote for either? |
Are you american citizen? I think your flag should be the country you're living in.
|