|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
^^ to me the first two paragraphs are almost lies. they are that misleading. followed by the rest of the article which is more/less a history lesson. concluding with the third paragraph summarizing by saying that we created Osama.
i mean, you said it yourself, "its not that simple". of course its never that simple. but the ARTICLE, which i have continually refered to, not you, wants to make you believe it is that simple.
|
[/QUOTE]
Do you want to counter argue the points opus made, or continue to spin what really happened so you can keep believing the fantasy the osama is a terrorist because he is a freedom hating loser. When are you going to realize the force that drives men like him, and continues to bring recruits to his cause. It's like the War on Drugs. You can't completely eradicate drugs, you eradicate the underlying problem that caused the epidemic in the first place. The underlying problem of Islamic terrorism is American involvement, starting with the cold war, in the middle east. Are you going to acknowledge we have been fucking with Iran since the 1950's and before that, the British monopolized Iranian oil for themselves. When the are going to accept that? The sooner the better.
___________________
|
