|
| quote: | | blames tools? nah man, z3ta blows away superwave in terms of phatness, I will also prove that another way, change yer suprwave waveforms to saw, and all i here a thin ass tone. |
ugh. zeta is a 6 oscillator monster with an extensive mod matrix and effects section. superwave trance pro is a 2 oscillator synth with a rather limited LFO and a simple delay on it. it also costs a 1/10th of the price of zeta and if you spend 24 quid (7 quid more), you get superwave pro with it. would be excellent value if it werent for the bugs. and unlike many cheapy VSTi softsynths it doesnt sound too out of place right in the front of a mix. blames tools? oh yes. ive heard too many tunes where people have made fruity's TS404 sound good to think that cheapy synths are good for nothing. zeta has a tighter bass end than trance pro, but both are different tools for different purposes. admittedly zeta is a more versatile instrument. but you can get cracking sounds out of both if you program it well and use it in the right place.
rb2k1. nope dont create synths in synthedit. i looked at the reaktor demo and it scared the living shit out of me. but i have used synthedit synths (superwave p8, pro, trance pro), supersaw plus demo and your supersaw 06. all of them are damn good little peices of software. for specific purposes though. i dont feel as if they are holding back my production. in fact, i think i have a hella lot to learn and the more i program these synths, the better sounds i can get out of them. i dont think i can keep up this rate of improvement. but right now, im the limiting factor in my productions. not my tools. i dont really expect this to change any time soon.
alot of people, not just here have a tendancy to blame their instruments for their own inability to get great sounds out of them.
|
