Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > Sports Discussion > Washington Nationals? or not?
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
treeboo
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Federal Outpost 19, a lonely quonset hut on Tower Road

I heard some Nats fans are bitching because the Nationals have't made any big moves to try to be competitive in the offseason. Sure, they made a strong deal to a top pitcher, but has the club done more than shuffle around some players? This team definitely overacheived last year, perhaps because of the prospect of actually playing to an audience, but can they do the same this year?


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Ygrene
This is deserving of a Lifetime CORe Whore Achievment award.

Old Post Dec-21-2005 04:17 
Click Here to See the Profile for treeboo Click here to Send treeboo a Private Message Add treeboo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Spartan
Looking Up



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC

quote:
Originally posted by bangoSkank
I heard some Nats fans are bitching because the Nationals have't made any big moves to try to be competitive in the offseason. Sure, they made a strong deal to a top pitcher, but has the club done more than shuffle around some players? This team definitely overacheived last year, perhaps because of the prospect of actually playing to an audience, but can they do the same this year?


you heard wrong.
the Nats have made a huge move in getting the best second basemen in baseball.

Old Post Dec-21-2005 06:11  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Spartan Click here to Send Spartan a Private Message Add Spartan to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Mebot
Maverick



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

quote:
Originally posted by Spartan
you heard wrong.
the Nats have made a huge move in getting the best second basemen in baseball.


Too bad we're going to be sticking him in the outfield, where he doesn't want to go.

Yeah and we haven't been making any moves except trading some key players (Wilky and Castilla) and letting pitchers go (Carrasco, Armas & Loiza). Our Farm system is a joke and where are all the pitchers that Bowden was "promising" to get?

I dunno, (if the Nationals are here next season), I don't see them finishing the same as they did this season.

Old Post Dec-21-2005 13:02 
Click Here to See the Profile for Mebot Click here to Send Mebot a Private Message Add Mebot to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shamez214
Chasing the Cool



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Basin City

quote:
Originally posted by Spartan
you heard wrong.
the Nats have made a huge move in getting the best second basemen in baseball.


Ummm... no.

Last year, Brian Roberts, Chse Utley, Jeff Kent, and Marcus Giles were all better.

And next year, I'm sure there will be even more who are better. Soriano's offense deficiencies are going to exposed playing 81 games a RFK. Wilkerson is certainly the more valuable player.


___________________
*can't imagine it feelin' much better...
i wish it would just last forever.
and so, to feel like that?
i'd pay any price just to get that back.
*

Old Post Dec-21-2005 13:33 
Click Here to See the Profile for Shamez214 Click here to Send Shamez214 a Private Message Visit Shamez214's homepage! Add Shamez214 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Mebot
Maverick



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

We'll see how Wilkerson plays in Texas. Wilkerson was killing the team with his strikeouts. I can't tell you how many times he looked at strike three and walked back to the dugout.

Wilkerson hit .248 with 11 home runs, 57 RBIs and 147 strikeouts. Let's see how long the Rangers tolerate the strikeouts. If Wilkerson hit .330 with 50 home runs and 130 RBIs, the strikeouts would be less of a concern.

Old Post Dec-21-2005 14:01 
Click Here to See the Profile for Mebot Click here to Send Mebot a Private Message Add Mebot to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shamez214
Chasing the Cool



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Basin City

Wilkerson doesn't make as many outs as Soriano does. A strike out for Wilkerson is definitely better than a strike out for Soriano. If Soriano hits the ball on the ground, he has a *chance* to beat it out. If Wilkerson hits a ball on the ground, it's a 6-4-3 double play. The Strike Out is overrated. I'd rather have my player strike out than ground out any time.

And... it's not like Soriano doesn't have his share of K's either... 125 last year. With 33 walks. Wilkerson: 147 Ks with 84 walks. BIIIIIIG difference. Like I said, Soriano got on base .308% of the time last year. Wilkerson? .351% of the time.

And last... look at the lineup that Soriano had to work with as opposed to the one Wilkerson was in. People tend to forget that RBI totals are almost entirely based on how well your team is getting on base. Soriano had Teixiera and Michael Young on base in front of him. Wilkerson batted lead-off which means he was following the pitcher.


___________________
*can't imagine it feelin' much better...
i wish it would just last forever.
and so, to feel like that?
i'd pay any price just to get that back.
*

Old Post Dec-21-2005 15:08 
Click Here to See the Profile for Shamez214 Click here to Send Shamez214 a Private Message Visit Shamez214's homepage! Add Shamez214 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Mebot
Maverick



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

Good point. I just think a strike out is just visually more disappointing. With a potential ground out (or seeing the ball hit into what you think could be a ground out)there's always the possibility of an error by the infielder or something.

Plus, yeah like you said, i don't think Wilkerson will be leading off for the Rangers.

Old Post Dec-21-2005 15:52 
Click Here to See the Profile for Mebot Click here to Send Mebot a Private Message Add Mebot to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shamez214
Chasing the Cool



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Basin City

Yep. I just checked.

Soriano = 288 At-Bats with runners on base.
Wilkerson = 157 At-Bats with runners on base.

Huge difference.

Soriano w/ RISP = .235/.275/.458
Wilkerson w/ RISP = .283/.471/.465


___________________
*can't imagine it feelin' much better...
i wish it would just last forever.
and so, to feel like that?
i'd pay any price just to get that back.
*

Old Post Dec-21-2005 20:22 
Click Here to See the Profile for Shamez214 Click here to Send Shamez214 a Private Message Visit Shamez214's homepage! Add Shamez214 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > Sports Discussion > Washington Nationals? or not?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackOld prog track No 3 to ID [2005] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackKate Ryan - My Love (Peter Luts Remix) [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 22:44.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!