quote:

I just said LiveSet to people had the idea that it´s a non stop set...

The english name for that is 'non-stop mix'

I'm sorry for going off topic again, but what are you doing here in the amateur dj section if you are considered one of Brasil's best dj's???
Don't mean to offend you, but that seems a bit strange to me...

1st - Is there a `´Professional Djs Section`` ??? I didn´t see it, sorry...
2nd - What wrong with you about me staying here /
3rd - I can be famous in my country, but not in the world... Maybe I can consider myself a amateur in the world scene...

But I really think you offended me asking me why am I here... Even if you say that it wasn´t your intetion man ... I am here to share my Non Stop Sets, and you keep asking me stuffs and stuffs, over and over, like if you don´t believe that I am a professional dj... What´s wrong man ?

Cheers,
Dj With No Name

___________________
``Trance is the cure for your soul. Trance opens your mind. Trance makes you feel better. No doubt: In Trance, WE Trust ! ``

quote:

Originally posted by RavingLunatic Listening right now.. nice tracks, nice mixing! but the bitrate could be a bit higher 96k just sounds like FM radio to me, when I'm used to 192k or at least 128k *edit* done listening, nice! I like it.

The average human ear cannot tell the difference between 96 kps and 192 kps!

quote:

Originally posted by Paul Wilson The average human ear cannot tell the difference between 96 kps and 192 kps!

WHAT???

Are you serious about this statement? The difference is so obvious to me that I can't believe this. I cannot imagine anybody that is not deaf and can't hear the difference....
just my thought, though.

___________________

RetroActive 4

so this is a mix from vinyl or mp3?

___________________
what trainspotters are.

From the track selection I would guess it's MP3....?

___________________

"I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again."

quote:

Originally posted by djdawn WHAT??? Are you serious about this statement? The difference is so obvious to me that I can't believe this. I cannot imagine anybody that is not deaf and can't hear the difference.... just my thought, though.

I am 100% serious. There is literally no difference in quality between 96 kps + MP3's. Once I had an MP3 in 96 kps and I changed the bitrate up to 192 kps and he never even noticed anyu difference. I rip all my MP3's to 96 kps simply because you get a small file size and almost no loss in quality. Perhaps your thinking of 64 kps MP3's where there is clearly a difference, but there is almost no difference between 96 kps plus and is something the average human ear could never tell. People are just led to believe there's a difference simply because it says "96 kps" when you play them.

quote:

Originally posted by Paul Wilson I am 100% serious. There is literally no difference in quality between 96 kps + MP3's. Once I had an MP3 in 96 kps and I changed the bitrate up to 192 kps and he never even noticed anyu difference. I rip all my MP3's to 96 kps simply because you get a small file size and almost no loss in quality. Perhaps your thinking of 64 kps MP3's where there is clearly a difference, but there is almost no difference between 96 kps plus and is something the average human ear could never tell. People are just led to believe there's a difference simply because it says "96 kps" when you play them.

hahah... no Paul going from 96 kps to 192 kps is still the same as 96 quality kps, the quality will still sound the same as 96 even when you incode it back up to 196 or to what ever, when compressing from WAV to MP3 the quality is lost for ever.
there is a big difference between 128-96-64and even more at 44 and 22, but little difference from WAV-128

___________________
Signature is over the 500X150 limit, please resize.

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Pete hahah... no Paul going from 96 kps to 192 kps is still the same as 96 quality kps, the quality will still sound the same as 96 even when you incode it back up to 196 or to what ever, when compressing from WAV to MP3 the quality is lost for ever. there is a big difference between 128-96-64and even more at 44 and 22, but little difference from WAV-128

You obviously didn't understand what I just said.

"Once I had an MP3 in 96 kps and I changed the bitrate up to 192 kps and he never even noticed anyu difference"
Well but DJ Pete is right....what you did will not make it sound better. If you have an "original" wav and convert it to 96 and 192 you will know the difference when comparing those files.

If this is not what you meant, please make yourself more clear. Also, I think we should start a seperate thread about this in the DJ Zone or Chill-out, because we are wasting space in No Name's thread...

Paul, have you ever been to www.r3mix.net ?
There are people out there who can hear the difference between two files that are 180 and 185 kbps and were encoded with Lame using two different command lines...now I'm NOT capable of that, but I hear a clear difference between 96 and 192 and I will try to prove this by posting clips in the NEW thread we will have soon.
I don't have time for that right now, but I will later today...see you there, this is quite interesting

___________________

RetroActive 4

it was remixed in CDS and Vinyls... ( Like in a disco.) I used MK II for vinyls and CDJ100-S ( Pioneer) for cds

And about the quality, well, USE THAT MP3PRO and u´ll get a better quality of 192 ! THE BEST QUALITY ON EARTH MATE !

Cheers,
Dj With No Name

___________________
``Trance is the cure for your soul. Trance opens your mind. Trance makes you feel better. No doubt: In Trance, WE Trust ! ``

we can now continue this discussion here:
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=23645

see you there....sorry DJ With No Name!

___________________

RetroActive 4