|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sevas Stra
are you retarded?!?!?! DO YOU KNOW HOW OLD THE BIG BANG THEORY IS AND HOW MANY NEW THEORIES INCLUDING THE STRING THEORY (WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BIG BANG THEORY) accumilated over the years and all of them mathematicly proven including the Anti-Matter. How about you explain that? If matter is proven to possible and probable made without an existant matter before that how doesn't that prove Genesis? |
Ok, first of all, maybe you should let go of the Caps and focus on your grammer so I could understand what "If matter is proven to possible and probable made without an existant matter before that" is supposed to mean.
Now, not being retarded, I will try and explain myself.
String theory is not directly related to big bang, but M-Theory (stands for membranes, if anyone cares) which is based on string theory explains how our universe, which is made up of superstrings, could have been created. This theory modifies the big bang theory and fixes the 1 main problem it had, which is as even you could have guessed, where did all the stuff come from?
So, if you had bothered to think a little bit about what my last post said, about the perfect 10 dimensional universe FULL OF ENERGY, and maybe even thought of the MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN formula E=mc^2, you'd realise that:
1. Energy and matter are the same thing.
2. There was A LOT of energy in the universe before the big bang.
So, energy became matter, and that's how the big bang could have actually happened.
This theory is still just a theory, obviously, but at least science is attempting to discover what really happened. So before you bash anything that goes against your beliefs, why don't you try and understand it a little bit?
___________________
|