|
| quote: | Originally posted by ShadoWolf
No, because it's still a man and a woman. However, their marriage would be incomplete. Plus, those conditions are treatable and reversible. |
Can't say I've ever heard of a woman having a uterus IMPLANTED, so no, not always treatable reversible.
So in this case, the marriage is as you say "incomplete" because they can't have kids, but you'd still be fine with it because it's a man and a woman.
How is a gay couple any more "incomplete" if they can't naturally have children? Furthermore, the possibility also exists for them to adopt / have a surrogate child.
The entire idea of a "marriage" is just a social construct, and what can be constructed can also be renovated or torn-down and rebuilt.
|