quote:

Originally posted by Dj Tomer Don't tempt me like that...

Go on! Name someone!

quote:

Originally posted by George Smiley Go on! Name someone!

Meh, I was refering to the past I guess, can't see any countries attacking them, only terrorist organizations.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by h@x0r Maaz, with all your Russian skillz, I'm surprised you haven't been recruited by the "Los Federales" or whatever the secret agency your country has.

Hehe, I'd rather just teach languages... the "Federal" life is not really my cup of tea

quote:

Originally posted by h@x0r BTW, S proshedshim dnem rozhdeniya. Certain circumstances prevented me from congratulating you with all due sincerity and on time.

Spasibo

___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]

quote:

Originally posted by Dj Tomer Meh, I was refering to the past I guess, can't see any countries attacking them, only terrorist organizations.

Suicide terrorists with intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles - actually, I'm feeling very generous - with short range theatre nuclear missiles strapped to them? Hmmmm?!

quote:

Originally posted by Lira Spasibo

Yes, Spasibo seems an appropriate word to describe h@x0r...!

quote:

Originally posted by George Smiley Suicide terrorists with intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles - actually, I'm feeling very generous - with short range theatre nuclear missiles strapped to them? Hmmmm?!

Is it not feasible for the Hammas to get a nuke? Or any of the other major terrorist groups? I think if one of them got their hands on one, they'd pose the biggest threat of all, since they've proven they don't care much for the repercussions of their attacks.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Dj Tomer Is it not feasible for the Hammas to get a nuke? Or any of the other major terrorist groups? I think if one of them got their hands on one, they'd pose the biggest threat of all, since they've proven they don't care much for the repercussions of their attacks.

Well it is a great concern poorly guarded Russian nuclear material could get into the wrong hands, but it would be extremely difficult for a non-state actor to use that material to mount an attack (they would not be able to use missiles for example). It is very unlikely that would go unnoticed or undetected (they would have to leave it somehwere near the target not launch it from a distance). The more likely use of a WMD by terrorists would be a Chemical or Biological substance that could fairly easily be delivered (crop spraying planes etc). Nukes however cost shit loads and would be almost impossible to use as a weapon without facilities only available to states...

As for Hamas, I seriously doubt whether they would use a nuke against Israel due to the amount of Arabs they would kill, add that to the fact that if they do have designs on Israel's land, why make it uninhabital for a few hundred years? Also the risk of the radioactive cloud blowing into Gaza or the West Bank...

Its much more likely to be biological weapons used by terrorists in the future...nuclear weapons are to complicated....biological weapons are simple to use and act upon....its allready been mentioned....a small aeroplane and millions could die...with the right biological weapon on board....

quote:

Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk:: hmm, i guess we dont hear of conflict every single day in the news, there arent more frequent earthquakes happening, and natural disasters, ehh, no famines going on in africa.

Hmm, like famines and wars didn't happen in the past years. The fact of the matter is that there is less famine, disease, and wars than ever before in history. The primary reason why we still hear about those things is because of Africa that's still living in the middle ages, the age in which radical christianity flourished.

quote:

a little interesting thing about the earthquakes going on. worldwide. the last 4 years, there have been about 8,000 more earthquakes in 2004 than in 2000, and every year in between, a steady growth. there were 4,000 more earthquakes in 1999 than in 1990. there were 13,562 more earthquakes in 2004 than in 1990im not saying this is a fulfillment of a prophecy, but there is the possibility. .http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/eqstats.html

Yes, but the reason why there are more earthquakes is because there are many more earthquakes with magnitude less than 3 detected. Now, a magnitude 3 earthquake is a really weak one, and probably the reason why they weren't as detected as earlier is because of the fact that we now have more sensitive equipment. If you take a look at strong magnitude earthquakes, their number is pretty much the same.

quote:

where and when do u think all these nucleur weapons everyone's developing and stockpiling are going to be used and how. world events are building up to the climax.

What climax? The climax of a possible nuclear war was during cuban missile crises.

___________________
1+1=10