quote:

Originally posted by Cal America wouldn't stand a chance against Caesar's ninjas. And if the ninjas somehow failed, Russel crowe certainly wouldn't.

maximus(crowe), if u remember was from spain, a spainard.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk:: "and remember, it took rome a very long time to stop sparticus the gladiator during the slave rebellion, and they never stopped hannibal. and this was in the rome's home turf. america on the other hand, has fought its modern wars all outside its domestic land."

If the Romans didn't stop Hannibal, why wasn't Rome destroyed instead of Carthage?

quote:

Originally posted by Spartan Maybe modern day Swedes and Fins will conquer America?

Alright, who's the bastard rat??

___________________



insignificant cor member alliance

quote:

Originally posted by Frode If the Romans didn't stop Hannibal, why wasn't Rome destroyed instead of Carthage?

quote:

Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk:: maximus(crowe), if u remember was from spain, a spainard.

That was a lie disseminated by Saddam Hussein in cahoots with Billy Dee Williams

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_bas wow awesome!! that's way bigger than mine

quote:

Originally posted by Spartan Maybe modern day Swedes and Fins will conquer America?

quote:

Originally posted by Cloudburst Alright, who's the bastard rat??

haha dude why is that offensive? and I'm from Stockholm anyways

i think you guys are forgetting the Jar Jar vs. Star Wars Robots theory. technology is nothing against angry apes

quote:

Originally posted by Frode If the Romans didn't stop Hannibal, why wasn't Rome destroyed instead of Carthage?

because when hannibal got word that carthage was under direct threat, he travelled back to carthage. he wasnt defeated in italy, but was defeated in north africa. and with that, carthage was defeated, and the city salted so that it could never be rebuilt.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk:: because when hannibal got word that carthage was under direct threat, he travelled back to carthage. he wasnt defeated in italy, but was defeated in north africa. and with that, carthage was defeated, and the city salted so that it could never be rebuilt.

ok...i see what you're saying...but wasn't he still defeated?

quote:

Originally posted by Spartan haha dude why is that offensive? and I'm from Stockholm anyways

it was meant as piss poor joke, that someone had ratted out on our plans to conquer the US...

sometimes sarcasm and average english doesn't go hand in hand...

___________________



insignificant cor member alliance

Folks I think hes talking in order of magnitude. Not by technology. Granted the technology of war was pretty damn good back then I doubt that in todays war tactics the phalanx would come in handy. Lets make it even shall we. A bow would be an m16, the trebuchets would be mortar or artillery. The horse drawn carriages would be some type of armoured mechanised vehicle. Just think of the romans' war-tech the same as our current war-tech but maybe 10 years in the past from today 2005. This question requires folks to think outside the box.

quote:

Originally posted by Floorfiller ok...i see what you're saying...but wasn't he still defeated?

lol, yes i said that. he was defeated in north africa. not italy.

___________________