 |
|
|
|
 |
starglider
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
|
|
I don't see how that's unethical. They could easily offer mp3s as well as wavs, for someone who didn't want to download big files. Besides, in today's world of broadband and several hundred gig hard drives, wav files aren't that big.
|
|
Feb-03-2005 00:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
kr00t0n
Archduke of Awesome

Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Hibernating
|
|
|
Feb-03-2005 01:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
starglider
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by trance_n_dance
They are when you 7,000+ MP3s already take up most of your hard drive. It's more just a matter of download time than anything, I'd rather download the file that's 1/4 the size that will take up less space than one that isn't but only has a slight increase in quality. |
Okay, but 7,000 MP3s isn't going to be more than about 80 gigs. 7,000 WAVs would be about 500-600 gigs. This may seem like a lot, but hard drives are only getting bigger. Soon that won't seem like much.
|
|
Feb-03-2005 01:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
regulate
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: lake jackson TX TA # 26
|
|
|
Feb-03-2005 05:47
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|