|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Dunno I always thought it was just England at that point (that included Wales) but like I said, British politics aint really my thang (altho I have studied British and European History at a-level but that was long ago!) |
I think by that time you'd taken James (your first our 6th) as king
| quote: | James Charles Stuart became King James the VI of Scotland in 1567 when he was only 13 months old. Then some 33 years later, on March 24, 1603, he also became King James I of England. King James' English predecessor, Queen Elizabeth, had died childless with no named succesor. It is said that Queen Elizabeth assumed that King James would be her successor--he was a proven king and a descendant of English King Henry VII (King Henry VII's daughter Margaret married James IV of Scotland).
When King James Charles Stuart ascended to the English throne he became King James VI of Scotland and King James I of England--hence, King James VI & I. King James was now the first King of what he liked to call Great Britain. His ascension to the English throne forever joined the crowns of England and Scotland. The line of Scottish kings ended with King James VI. |
>>>LINKY<<<
Bet you americans never realised it was a Scottish king who became king of England rather than the other way round?
Bitches can still nail us at the footie tho. 
then it all went a bit bit pete tong with his son Charles
| quote: | A problem in Scotland brought an abrupt end to Charles' 11 years of personal rule and unleashed the forces of civil war upon England. Charles attempted to force a new prayer book on the Scots, which resulted in rebellion. Charles' forces were ill prepared due to lack of proper funds, causing the king to call, first, the Short Parliament, and finally the Long Parliament. King and Parliament again reached no agreement; Charles foolishly tried to arrest five members of Parliament on the advice of Henrietta Maria, which brought matters to a head. The struggle for supremacy led to civil war. Charles raised his standard against Parliamentary forces at Nottingham in 1642.
Religious and economic issues added to the differences between the supporters of the monarchy (Cavaliers) and the supporters of Parliament (Roundheads). The lines of division were roughly as follows: Cavalier backing came from peasants and nobility of Episcopalian roots while Roundhead backing came from the emerging middle class and tradesmen of the Puritanical movement. Geographically, the northern and western provinces aided the Cavaliers, with the more financially prosperous and populous southern and eastern counties lending aid to the Roundheads. The bottom line is that the Roundheads, with deeper pockets and more population from which to draw, were destined to win the battle. Oliver Cromwell and his New Model Army at Naseby soundly routed the Cavaliers in 1645. Scarcely a year later Charles surrendered to Scottish forces, which turned the king over to Parliament. In 1648, Charles was put on trial for treason; the tribunal, by a vote of 68 to 67, found the king guilty and ordered his execution in 1649.. |
>>>LINKY<<<
edit: 68 to 67... thats gotta be anoying... enough to lose your head over even 
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
Last edited by Dervish on Apr-10-2005 at 17:32
|