|
I agree with that, if I take classical music and make it 7 x faster, the instruments, time signature, etc, remain classical. The key part of that website though is the concept of "traditional sense". You are right that a trance song played slower or faster is still trance, technically, but not what one would traditionally expect when they think of trance. While I may be wrong, I would never consider a song at 180BPM house, or a song at 60BPM trance. It may have once been house or trance, but it is no longer once it has been manipulated in this way. Ironically, if you took a rock song and speed it up to dance music speeds, often the average person will think that they made a "techno version".
I also agree that BPM is not definitive, but it is usually indicative, of genre. Also, if Armin says himself that he plays both trance AND progressive, does it not suggest that I am somewhat correct in suggesting that not all of the tracks he plays are trance? On the same topic, would you consider what Markus Schulz plays as all trance? I find he too plays a lot of progressive, or, at a minimum, tracks that aren't necessarily trance.
|