quote:

Originally posted by kush paintings I think it can be safely established, the last site I posted does nothing to go out of its way and actually prove the statements written in their articles, therefore the sight is unreliable. The next sight that this article, written by Diana Reynolds, appeared in was an organization website called "the Public Eye: Website of Political Research Associates". This looked very promissing, however if you browse around the website you will that there is a strong political leaning on it. They even have ann article entitled, Drifting Right and Going Wrong. I am not saying this is enough to discredit this sight, but it clearly is a site that has a strong political leaning. If I am not going to get my news from Fox, why the hell should I get it from here. http://www.publiceye.org/frontpage/overview.html What I am trying to do, is find if any clearly, credible sights have this article posted, because I do not know the credibility of the original site. However, it seems as though it is 0 for 2. Oh, and by the way, here is a link to the original site, to simply show the integrity of the source you have provided. http://www.skepticfiles.org/socialis/bushnose.htm

Dude, there are very few major media sites in which you will be able to find that thing called, "credible information." It's one giant whitewash starting from the top down. They want you to remain ignorant, and you're not putting much of a fight to become otherwise.

Instead of attacking the messenger, try going and doing a little research on your own. There are a few government site that have some info, and there are other places that have subpoenaed files through the Freedom of Information Act. It's all spread out over the internet.

Anyway, I'm only here to pique your curiosity. You can do you own due diligence.



http://www.thememoryhole.org/index.htm

http://www.thememoryhole.org/terror/tyler-terror.htm

http://www.thememoryhole.org/media/cnn-protesters.htm

agreed with trancer, u have to read the material, and check the validity of the material, not of the sites, discreting information because the sites may have a couple of wacky articles isnt the best way to discard information. discard the information once u have prooved it to be wrong.

Progress and reaction have both turned out to be swindles. Seemingly, there is nothing left but quietism - robbing reality of its terrors by simply submitting to it.
George Orwell
The best books... are those that tell you what you know already.
George Orwell

Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious.
George Orwell
The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history.
George Orwell
There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them.
George Orwel
War is a way of shattering to pieces... materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses... too intelligent.
George Orwell
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
George Orwell
War is war. The only good human being is a dead one.
George Orwell
What can you do against the lunatic who is more intelligent than yourself, who gives your arguments a fair hearing and then simply persists in his lunacy?
George Orwell
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
George Orwell

Secondary Devices (.mp3)

quote:

Originally posted by venomX agreed with trancer, u have to read the material, and check the validity of the material, not of the sites, discreting information because the sites may have a couple of wacky articles isnt the best way to discard information. discard the information once u have prooved it to be wrong.

Thank you