|
| quote: | Originally posted by alligator
has it occured to you that it was said in a half sarcastic tone...regardless on a serious note...we both know that a dj booth is not that big, and having a photographer in there, taking photos with a flash (why?...well most of the clubs i've been there is not enough lighting for pictures)...therefore having the flash in your eyes while working isn't something i'd like...
anyhow it's just another person in the booth that will take up space and won't help the set, nor the show....if she wants pictures she can take them from outside b/c then she catches the crowd (not that form the booth she won't), or she can take them after the show with the dj when he's not under any stress...
so for a different angle i don't think it's worth while to disturb someone at work, let him entertain the mass of people that have showed up and respect the space he needs to do so |
Well if you want to be smartass about it, tones aren't reflected when it's typed.
I don't really see your point because your statements either gross generalizations or assumptions.
"we both know that a dj booth is not that big" -- Not all booths are small. Club Space in Miami has nice sitting area beside the DJ area. It just so happens, the main edm club in Atlanta, Eleven50, can have a large DJ booth of the promoter's choosing.
Your whole point of blinding a DJ while in the booth with photography is really moot because almost all shots from within the booth are from behind and the side of a DJ's vision. The real blinders are flashes from the front, outside of the booth. Regardless, no one likes a flash in their eye, it is their job as a professional DJ to ignore it the best they can and continue.
To your point, no a photographer does nothing to help a DJ set but those angled shots aren't for the DJ in the first place. Those shots used by the promoter, DJ management, the club and various published and online magazines. So you see how important it is for her to be in the booth doing her job.
Last edited by Scottaculous on Aug-17-2005 at 20:51
|