quote:

Originally posted by St_Andrew Al quaida/Iraqi insurgence is trying to win a war, you are trying to win a war. Why would your bad actions be justified in order to win a war, but not theirs?

9/11 isn't a part of this war. why would i want them to win? lmao. we should torture and nuke them to win. that's the point. they wanna cut our heads off? we will cut theirs off. and that's wrong? ofcourse not. life is a bitch and then you die.

___________________
My SpaceMySpaceMUSIC
Anti-Purple Alliance.

quote:

Originally posted by Lepanto 9/11 isn't a part of this war. why would i want them to win? lmao. we should torture and nuke them to win. that's the point. they wanna cut our heads off? we will cut theirs off. and that's wrong? ofcourse not. life is a bitch and then you die.

its more retarded then wrong i think.

___________________
Liverpool Champions of Europe 2005!


TA's NFL survival League winner 2006!

quote:

Originally posted by Lepanto 9/11 isn't a part of this war. why would i want them to win? lmao. we should torture and nuke them to win. that's the point. they wanna cut our heads off? we will cut theirs off. and that's wrong? ofcourse not. life is a bitch and then you die.

By going down towards their level you already lost the war imo.

quote:

Originally posted by St_Andrew By going down towards their level you already lost the war imo.

seriously doubt it'd be the same after the war. this war a complicated one so you can't make everything seem so simple.

___________________
My SpaceMySpaceMUSIC
Anti-Purple Alliance.

quote:

Originally posted by Spacey Orange what's to stop the US government from abducting people anywhere on the globe and secretly incarcerating them indefintely or secretly killing them? first, there was the rendition program, that in practice is tantamount to kidnapping by US government. then, there was the enemy combatant status given to US citizens on US soil, US citizens on foreign soil, and foreigners on a foreign soil. the US government has argued, successfully thus far, that this permits it to hold people indefintiely without access to courts. is anyone safe? if someone dissapears anywhere, how would someone know that it wasn't the US gov't behind the dissappearance because as i undertstand it, the detention could be indefinite and could be kept secret. doesn't this bother or anger anyone else?

Um...and other countries can't do this why?

___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."

quote:

...it is kinda ironic as a westerner when you start a war to defend democracy, yet in that war you use tactics that is in direct contrast to one of the corner stones of democracy!

I for one don't believe it was to defend democracy so much as to defend our economy (i.e., get access to that oil!).

I also see nothing wrong with that, for a lot of reasons.

I do think that the Iraqi people will now benefit from some form of Democracy though...and they CERTAINLY were NOT better off under Saddam and his tortures I'd think.

These attempts to villainize the U.S. and sprout grand-conspiracy theories of evil are just absurd. Anyone who lives here knows that the bleeding-heart Liberals of this country have made it a haven for criminals of all kinds, including potential Terrorists, because every asshole has "rights", and certainly criminals of every kind have them in spades because they are "misunderstood" or are victims of circumstance, etc...

IMHO, we're not nearly hard enough on the Terrorists. Maybe if everyone wasn't so damned concerned with Terrorists "rights", we'd be making some fucking progress in this war on Terror already!

What we need really is to give Saddam immunity, make him the head of our "Interrogation" unit at Gitmo, and finally get some results!!