Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > State funded sex?
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
St_Andrew
I <3 NYC



Registered: May 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by trancaholic
About gmoney: This guy managed to get himself banned from the NY subforum (which has no mod!), and for good reasons. I advise you all to ignore him, as his stated goal of being here is to stir shit and get banned.
EDIT: Source


Interesting, I think someone should fullfill his wish...

Old Post Oct-06-2005 10:48  Europe
Click Here to See the Profile for St_Andrew Click here to Send St_Andrew a Private Message Visit St_Andrew's homepage! Add St_Andrew to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
HardTranceProd
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Washington DC

Hey gmoney,

I agree with you but you are missing some important points.

For example, if it's true that people with some deficiencies can't get laid, then evolution would have weeded out those genes forever out of the gene pool. Yet, we have a lot of males who for example are 5'2", very short. We have a lot of males who are not good-looking. However, their parents had children and the parents before them did, allowing the genes to stay in the pool. Why did evolution allow that?

In other words, we are not all good-looking tall men, yet if one were to blindly follow the evolution argument, we should all be.

Also, don't forget the following issue... When a girl sees a man with another girl, no matter how fat or ugly, she gets competitive. Thus, in order to become successful, the man simply needs to get started with the first woman, which will then bring a stream of successes (other women will automatically be interested). In this way, even an average or below-average man can be reproductively successful.

Old Post Oct-06-2005 12:46  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for HardTranceProd Click here to Send HardTranceProd a Private Message Add HardTranceProd to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
metalgearsolid
I am a sexist



Registered: Apr 2005
Location: For you neo/

^^^Dude that advice/explanation was better than most dating guru's


gmoney serioulsy though smart/beautiful people are not the ones who created the internet/computer/airplane/vaccines/math/science/literature/writing/ thinking/anything having to do with math or science you don't have a sexy person you have an extremely intelligent individual who might not be the most physically attractive person but he is smarter than most "sexy/intelligent" people. However simply because you might not consider him attractive does not mean he is ugly all what a shallow individual like yourself has to do is talk with him. You will get to know him but chances are a smart individual would want nothing to do with you. They only hand out with intellectuals sorry gmoney you are not one of those and never will be. Enough said.

MGS

Last edited by metalgearsolid on Oct-06-2005 at 13:08

Old Post Oct-06-2005 13:00 
Click Here to See the Profile for metalgearsolid Click here to Send metalgearsolid a Private Message Visit metalgearsolid's homepage! Add metalgearsolid to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Gmoney part II
tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boston

I will now address the last 3 replies above me.

1) I did manage to get myself banned due to my behavior in the NY forum. I have learned my lesson and will not do the same thing again. The sheer annoyance of having to reconfigure my computer to come back from a perma-ban is enough motivation for me.

2) My theory of survival of the fittest( well, its not mine but I have adapted it to my needs) works. I will tell you why. Women want to procreate with the men that are most viable. Good-looking smart men have the best chance of being successful in this world. Of course there are exceptions, like one can develop a drug addiction ,etc.But, if you look at the odds, this will hold true. So while Jethro can procreate with his obese wife in some West Virginian hovel, there children won't do better than any of either of them. However, someone like Brad Pitt will never have sex with this obesity because he has better options(i.e. supermodels)
However, a guy who is 5'2 that is smart and has other attributes may also be successful. So when he drives by in his new Ferrari F430, the women will go for it. The point here is this: People are successful for a reason and people wind up at the bottom for a reason. It doesn't matter what the reason is but there is a reason.
Michael Jordan got cut from his highschool basketball team his freshmen year. But because Jordan had something inside him besides his athletic ability, he became the best basketball player in the world (not to mention a multi-multi millionare.)
Bill Gates dropped out of college. But instead of seving mozzarella sticks at his local Olive Garden, he became the richest man in the world. He also had something inside him that drove him to this goal.
Both Michael Jordan and Bill Gates can have any woman they want because they are "the fittest", they have the resources (i.e. money) that women want. Its the like the whole thing with alpha-male and beta-female theory in animals. So while good-looking smart people have the best chance in life, other people have a chance too (just not as much of one).


___________________
A KINDER AND GENTLER GMONEY

Last edited by Gmoney part II on Oct-07-2005 at 00:19

Old Post Oct-07-2005 00:11  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Gmoney part II Add Gmoney part II to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

i hardly think that a person having one good idea thus means they qualify for the elite \"fittest\" group you keep describing. there are plenty of talented individuals around that put their significant energy & creativity into worthwhile things that have nothing to do with making money. equating wealth-creation with \"fittest\" is thoroughly misleading, as well as painting women as subordinate and essential gold diggers


___________________

Old Post Oct-07-2005 00:20  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Gmoney part II
tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boston

No ,actually you are wrong. 30 % of the people I know have really good ideas. But 99% of the 30% don't have the balls or the know-how to execute their ideas. If you are to be succesful, you can't just have an idea and sit on your ass and watch TV thinking about your idea, you have to go after it. Even if you "lose your shirt" at they call it, at least when you look back on your life when you are 75, you can say to yourself that you went after your dream.

And most women are gold-diggers:

In the words of the rapper Fabulous:
" And I pinch myself
I know these money-hungry bitches want to taste my wealth
But I keep them on a diet
Or keep them on the quiet
And take a deep breath"


___________________
A KINDER AND GENTLER GMONEY

Old Post Oct-07-2005 00:36  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Gmoney part II Add Gmoney part II to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ali92
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Fishtown, Philadelphia

I think this is nice that the state would pay for this. Heck, I'd much rather see the state paying for this than paying for my PlayStation & FLAC+MP3 album-collecting & ROM/ISO-collecting addiction.

And Gmoney, I think you should learn how to respect your peers. What if you were in this exact situation?

Personally, I'd be a little embarrassed at first, asking the state for funds that would go to this either directly or not, but if I were really handicapped/physically disabled past a certain point and I KNOW that I couldn't sexually attract anyone anymore, as the months & years go by, I would like it to be paid for.

Heck, even right now, I have trouble attracting girls and I don't really know too good about how to get _and hold_ their attention beyond 5 seconds.

Old Post Oct-07-2005 15:29  United Nations
Click Here to See the Profile for ali92 Click here to Send ali92 a Private Message Add ali92 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
metalgearsolid
I am a sexist



Registered: Apr 2005
Location: For you neo/

Ali I will tell you how to "attract" a girl to you. First lose weight, afterall that time you spend on the internet, you must have grown a bit too much. Than after you lose weight go up to a girl and say "Hey bitch whats up?" The girl at first might act all offended but after a little time goes by she will be back wanting you.

Really all what you have to do is talk with them at first that they get accustomed to having you to talk with and after that play a bit hard to get. That is all.

Old Post Oct-07-2005 15:43 
Click Here to See the Profile for metalgearsolid Click here to Send metalgearsolid a Private Message Visit metalgearsolid's homepage! Add metalgearsolid to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ali92
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Fishtown, Philadelphia

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Ali I will tell you how to "attract" a girl to you. First lose weight, afterall that time you spend on the internet, you must have grown a bit too much. Than after you lose weight go up to a girl and say "Hey bitch whats up?" The girl at first might act all offended but after a little time goes by she will be back wanting you.

Really all what you have to do is talk with them at first that they get accustomed to having you to talk with and after that play a bit hard to get. That is all.
:-)
I wouldn't consider 69 kg way overboard, but my body mass index for my height (167 cm) is 25.04 and that's considered slightly overweight.

Old Post Oct-07-2005 21:10  United Nations
Click Here to See the Profile for ali92 Click here to Send ali92 a Private Message Add ali92 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
metalgearsolid
I am a sexist



Registered: Apr 2005
Location: For you neo/

So you are only five feet and four inches and 145ibs? If that is right than man you are short little fat guy!

Old Post Oct-07-2005 21:40 
Click Here to See the Profile for metalgearsolid Click here to Send metalgearsolid a Private Message Visit metalgearsolid's homepage! Add metalgearsolid to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ali92
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Fishtown, Philadelphia

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
So you are only five feet and four inches and 145ibs? If that is right than man you are short little fat guy!
About 5 feet and 7 inches in Imperial/US system. Weight: around 148 pounds (just weighed) in US system.

I guess that translates to a BMI of around 25.1, still.

Old Post Oct-08-2005 00:24  United Nations
Click Here to See the Profile for ali92 Click here to Send ali92 a Private Message Add ali92 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
St_Andrew
I <3 NYC



Registered: May 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
So you are only five feet and four inches and 145ibs? If that is right than man you are short little fat guy!


Ehm, no. I guess not thin but still rather normal I would say... bmi 25.1 is pretty much ideal weight...

Old Post Oct-09-2005 10:45  Europe
Click Here to See the Profile for St_Andrew Click here to Send St_Andrew a Private Message Visit St_Andrew's homepage! Add St_Andrew to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > State funded sex?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackIan van Dahl- will i (unknown mix) [2004] [8]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHumate - "Love Stimulation" (Lovemix by Paul van Dyk) [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!