|
Hey gmoney,
I agree with you but you are missing some important points.
For example, if it's true that people with some deficiencies can't get laid, then evolution would have weeded out those genes forever out of the gene pool. Yet, we have a lot of males who for example are 5'2", very short. We have a lot of males who are not good-looking. However, their parents had children and the parents before them did, allowing the genes to stay in the pool. Why did evolution allow that?
In other words, we are not all good-looking tall men, yet if one were to blindly follow the evolution argument, we should all be.
Also, don't forget the following issue... When a girl sees a man with another girl, no matter how fat or ugly, she gets competitive. Thus, in order to become successful, the man simply needs to get started with the first woman, which will then bring a stream of successes (other women will automatically be interested). In this way, even an average or below-average man can be reproductively successful.
|