 |
|
|
|
 |
basd
progression

Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere nowhere
|
|
|
Dec-07-2005 22:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
SteveAngello
tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Haak
if you are really Steve Angello, why the hell would you make a track meant to be filler? |
Alot of people make filler tracks, Ive made quite a few over my time, you cant play banging stuff for 2 hours straight, if you do, you arent a DJ, besides ever hear of trying new things ? Artists are allowed to go in a different direction every once in a while, and not just use the same synth, same pads, same shit for every track they put out
|
|
Dec-08-2005 02:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
basd
progression

Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere nowhere
|
|
|
Dec-08-2005 11:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
Haak
analog evading shark

Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SteveAngello
Alot of people make filler tracks, Ive made quite a few over my time, you cant play banging stuff for 2 hours straight, if you do, you arent a DJ, besides ever hear of trying new things ? Artists are allowed to go in a different direction every once in a while, and not just use the same synth, same pads, same shit for every track they put out |
did i say anything to indicate i'm against trying new things? and do you really call this trying new things? it sounds like all your other tunes except it's emptier. what i meant is why would you make a half-assed tune on purpose? i could understand it if you only wanted to use it in your own sets, but why throw it out for relase then, a-side even? personally i could never call a tune finished untill i think it's really great, but people are different i guess.
___________________
Uncredible Haak on Soundcloud
Uncredible Haak - September 2008 mix
|
|
Dec-08-2005 14:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
Wyndham
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Haak
did i say anything to indicate i'm against trying new things? and do you really call this trying new things? it sounds like all your other tunes except it's emptier. what i meant is why would you make a half-assed tune on purpose? i could understand it if you only wanted to use it in your own sets, but why throw it out for relase then, a-side even? personally i could never call a tune finished untill i think it's really great, but people are different i guess. |
ur quite the idiot in the first place for asking why someone would make a filler song... if u think a producers job or djs job is to only put out/play massive songs ur very wrong. Any good dj, hell any dj that knows anything will tell you its the filler songs that make the difference in your sets, not the anthems u drop. Anyone can drop anthems but its what u play inbetween or to build up to them that makes the difference, how well u can keep people dancing in between ur big songs. Since angello djs too, its pretty obvious he made it for this purpose, a good song to keep people dancing while giving them a break at the same time.
good filler is the key to any djs set, without it ur just another radio dj dropping hits, which anyone can do.
just cause you dont classify this song as a "choon" doesn't mean its not a good song. I'd rather have an abundance of great filler than your "really great" anthems, makes your set much more diverse and you can take it many more directions.
He released this song for 2 reasons.. all djs need good filler, which is exactly what this song is.
and the $$$$ haha
|
|
Dec-08-2005 19:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
Haak
analog evading shark

Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Wyndham
ur quite the idiot in the first place for asking why someone would make a filler song... if u think a producers job or djs job is to only put out/play massive songs ur very wrong. Any good dj, hell any dj that knows anything will tell you its the filler songs that make the difference in your sets, not the anthems u drop. Anyone can drop anthems but its what u play inbetween or to build up to them that makes the difference, how well u can keep people dancing in between ur big songs. Since angello djs too, its pretty obvious he made it for this purpose, a good song to keep people dancing while giving them a break at the same time.
good filler is the key to any djs set, without it ur just another radio dj dropping hits, which anyone can do.
just cause you dont classify this song as a "choon" doesn't mean its not a good song. I'd rather have an abundance of great filler than your "really great" anthems, makes your set much more diverse and you can take it many more directions.
He released this song for 2 reasons.. all djs need good filler, which is exactly what this song is.
and the $$$$ haha |
idiot to you too. when i say a great tune, i don't mean an anthem. i don't rate the greatness of a tune depending on how "big" they sound. i know how to build a set, but i don't play any "filler" tracks, neither do i play many, if any "anthems". you build a set by using tracks with different levels of energy while keeping a nice flow.
what Angello said made it sound like he didn't put any effort into it and just made it for the money. the tune sounds like it took an hour or 2 to make, so he probably did.
___________________
Uncredible Haak on Soundcloud
Uncredible Haak - September 2008 mix
|
|
Dec-08-2005 21:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:01.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|