Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > physics anyone?
Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

quote:
Originally posted by Jive_Turkey
I thought as you approached the speed of light your mass increases such that when you reach the speed of light your mass would be infinite. Thats why its impossible to go the speed of light.


Basically, yeah.

And I'll be damned..my continuous trips to US and back caused my earthly lifespan to increase by a full 144 nanoseconds! And the trips I had with my car when I went on vacation and back added 3.6 nanoseconds more!


___________________
1+1=10

Last edited by DrUg_Tit0 on Feb-10-2006 at 14:55

Old Post Feb-10-2006 14:42  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Jive_Turkey
I thought as you approached the speed of light your mass increases such that when you reach the speed of light your mass would be infinite. Thats why its impossible to go the speed of light.


asymptotic. Yes. In theory. You would become a black hole of sorts. An object of infinite mass and infinitesmal size.

Old Post Feb-10-2006 15:04  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
NebulousQ
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

quote:
Originally posted by HardTranceProd
I thought, if you travelled at the speed of light, then time dilation would be so extreme that time would hold still. And then, if you exceeded the speed of light (impossible of course), you would go back in time (into the past).


If you were to travel at the speed of light time and space would become meaningless. In physics and to the eyes of a light particle the universe is an infinitesimally small space. In light's reference frame it is everywhere at once and everywhen at once. It is every"when" at once only because to light's refernce frame time has no meaning. The reason for all of this is the "dilation" that was mentioned before. The closer you get to the speed of light the more things change, distances get smaller, the rate of passing time changes, mass changes, etc. According to relativity the only two constants in the universe are the speed of light and the laws of physics.

If you think this all far out and a a bunch of bull, dont worry becuase no one really gets its either. In the words of my physics teacher:

"We are as confident in the validity of the theory of relativity, and our knowledge thereof, as we are confident in gravity. Wait that was a bad example because we dont really know that much about gravity..."

Old Post Feb-10-2006 18:44  Kyrgyzstan
Click Here to See the Profile for NebulousQ Click here to Send NebulousQ a Private Message Add NebulousQ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by NebulousQ
If you were to travel at the speed of light time and space would become meaningless. In physics and to the eyes of a light particle the universe is an infinitesimally small space. In light's reference frame it is everywhere at once and everywhen at once. It is every"when" at once only because to light's refernce frame time has no meaning. The reason for all of this is the "dilation" that was mentioned before. The closer you get to the speed of light the more things change, distances get smaller, the rate of passing time changes, mass changes, etc. According to relativity the only two constants in the universe are the speed of light and the laws of physics.


As much as I know this statement is probably pretty correct, I find myself taking issue with the "everywhere at once and everywhen at once" simply because the speed of light is not infinite. Light travels a distance as it moves, hence "light years" (a fucking god awfully large amount distance no doubt!). If light were both here and there (being arbitrary points in space), then it would have to essentially be omnipresent and hence move at an infinite speed to be in both places at once. But the fact that we can observe light from the sun knowing that the light we see is actually "4 minutes old" tells me that the light does not move with infinite speed.

Then again, you did say from the frame of reference of the light. Oh if only I could be light!

Old Post Feb-10-2006 19:43  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
hiram
vrooom!



Registered: May 2005
Location: Miami, United States

quote:
Originally posted by NebulousQ
In light's reference frame it is everywhere at once and everywhen at once. It is every"when" at once only because to light's refernce frame time has no meaning.


i dont see how this is so. even light takes time, years, millions of years to rech us from distant stars and galaxies. heck we see galaxies as they were thousands of years ago because thats how long it takes the light to get here.

Old Post Feb-11-2006 00:28  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for hiram Click here to Send hiram a Private Message Add hiram to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

To both of you shakka and hiram, yes in our reference frame light can be pinpointed to a single location and time. But since light is travelling, well, at the speed of light, the time dilation basically becomes infinite and therefore time in the rest of the universe flows infinitely faster than it does for the beam. So the beam is everywhen (heh I like that term) because if viewed from its reference frame, at the very instant it is created the rest of the universe has already unveiled from beginning to end. Unless maybe if it gets sucked up into a black hole or something in the meanwhile.


___________________
1+1=10

Old Post Feb-11-2006 01:57  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
To both of you shakka and hiram, yes in our reference frame light can be pinpointed to a single location and time. But since light is travelling, well, at the speed of light, the time dilation basically becomes infinite and therefore time in the rest of the universe flows infinitely faster than it does for the beam. So the beam is everywhen (heh I like that term) because if viewed from its reference frame, at the very instant it is created the rest of the universe has already unveiled from beginning to end. Unless maybe if it gets sucked up into a black hole or something in the meanwhile.



sweeeeet.

Old Post Feb-11-2006 04:26  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sunsnail
Global Moderator



Registered: Sep 2004
Location:

That is pretty sweet....

Old Post Feb-11-2006 05:20 
Click Here to See the Profile for Sunsnail Click here to Send Sunsnail a Private Message Add Sunsnail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Marc Summers
I must behave



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: New York, USA

One day we will visit life on other planets

At least, I hope.


___________________
"You won a new refrigerator, great! Where you gonna put it?" - Tony Danza

Old Post Feb-11-2006 15:49 
Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Summers Click here to Send Marc Summers a Private Message Add Marc Summers to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
metalgearsolid
I am a sexist



Registered: Apr 2005
Location: For you neo/

^^No, we will all be dead whenever that may happen.

Old Post Feb-11-2006 16:29 
Click Here to See the Profile for metalgearsolid Click here to Send metalgearsolid a Private Message Visit metalgearsolid's homepage! Add metalgearsolid to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Dervish
Your opinion matters.



Registered: Dec 2003
Location:

So if light is everywhen (like that too lol) how at the point light is created (from an energy conversion) from matter can it exist at all points in time? It surely can only exist from the point where it was "created"?

Actually re-read your post and you do say from the point it is created. But what happens when when it is converted into another form, for exmaple in plants? Where it is used.

Hmm think I'm confusing myself here.


___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.

Old Post Feb-11-2006 16:39 
Click Here to See the Profile for Dervish Click here to Send Dervish a Private Message Add Dervish to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

quote:
Originally posted by Dervish
So if light is everywhen (like that too lol) how at the point light is created (from an energy conversion) from matter can it exist at all points in time? It surely can only exist from the point where it was "created"?

Actually re-read your post and you do say from the point it is created. But what happens when when it is converted into another form, for exmaple in plants? Where it is used.

Hmm think I'm confusing myself here.


Well, when it's absorbet, it's finished, nothing happens. I suppose photons don't really have a long lifespan in their own frame of reference


___________________
1+1=10

Old Post Feb-11-2006 18:07  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > physics anyone?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackunknown house tune - please help !! [2003] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackLoway - "2 Bags of Grass" [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 20:16.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!