 |
|
|
|
 |
DJ Shibby
Amphoteric Superbase

Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Of Earthzen and the Therethen
|
|
|
Jun-11-2006 00:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
Aquarian
king of no pants
Registered: May 2005
Location: Laval, Quebec
|
|
|
There's certainly influence there, especially when it comes to big epic and melodic trance from the late 90s onward. As for psy, tribal, tech, darker and older kinds of trance, along with house music, techo and most EDM in general, if you want to draw a comparison, it should be with tribal music. It's been around for possibly millions of year - and this would just be a modern interpretation of it, coupled with modern influences like melodic elements.
|
|
Jun-11-2006 01:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
PETRAN
Like Antennas To Heaven

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Volos, Greece
|
|
|
OH GOD....
HOW THE HELL can trance be compared to classical i still can't understand?!?!?!I mean...how the complex evolving harmonic arrangements(comprised by giant orchestras with each and every man playing a note or a sequence of notes at a specific time!) of Mozart, tchaikovsky, beethoven(vivaldi was a bit simpler but still complex), brahms and the even more complex epic symphonies of mahler, wagner, berlioz, brahms or the unpredictable impressionistic works of debussy (with the melody changing in unpredictable ways every 2 secs.)be compared to a 4-note(!) riff that arpeggiates, just because a random guy pressed the "arpeggiate" button in fl-studio or the other "tracker" think that mirco de govia produces over a 4-4 bit...THIS IS PURE HERESSY OMG!!!!!!!!!EVIL...Stop this madness now!!!Trance is just club music guys...nothing more nothing less...
The only thing it could slightly relate to (and i mean really slightlllyyy)is the 20th century american minimalism of philip glass, john adams, steve reich etc. etc. etc. but still the relations between these are no bigger than...say e.g. a modern rock group like coldplay (who as well use simple minimalistic melancholic riffs but actually a bit more complex than trance as they don't press "buttons") to these american composers.
A very good example in my opinion as something modern close to classical or orchestral music in general (oohh by the way "classical" or "orchestral" music is not the same to "soundtrack" music like say e.g "vangelis"-who is very good but extremely simplistic in relatio to classical, ot say "hans Zimmer" or "John Williams" who are hm...just thieves of classical works and simple-epic-big-hollywood-theme-by-numbers-creating-machines)is the genre of "post-rock"(which is def. not rock) and i mean names like "Godspeed You Black Emperor"(ALL of you have to buy or even download the amazing double album with the name "Lift Your Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven"- an epic symphonic piece of art by a bunch of arounf 10+ enigmatic canadian musicians), "Explosions in the Sky", "Sigur Ros"(although more "rock" structure) and "Silver Mount Zion" with long 10-20 minute evolving arrangements with slow passages evolving to crescendos and stuff... sample-
Explosions in the Sky- "Yasmin the Light" http://www.explosionsinthesky.com/m...minTheLight.mp3
An even more profound relation is the genre of "symphonic post-rock" with bands like "Rachel's" (who are comprised by 17 musicians!) here are same samples- http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/sto...,254834,00.html
and "Clogs"-although these are more "minimalist"
philip glass-wise.
Anyway's...i can see the excitement of some new people when they hear instrumental melodic music (such as trance), they can get easily impressed these days, especially when the majority of todays "radio" music is quite stupid formulaic simple songs,garage, r'n'b and stuff, but still,trance is just mainstream music to dance to...there is muuuccchhh mooore music out there you know!!!
|
|
Jun-11-2006 03:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
cherrybarry
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: soul train
|
|
|
I completely agree. Just because it's instrumental doesn't mean it's classical. Just because you hear arpeggiation doesn't mean it's classical. Just because it's not pop doesn't mean it's classical.
Seriously, EDM is possibly the most rigid style of music ever. You're limited to a 4/4 beat at 120-140 bpms. Anything else isn't as danceable.
Plus, you're looping 4/8/16 beats over 3-8 minute intervals. It's the same phrase over and over again. The drumline gets repeated for 256 beats or whatever. You don't see that kind of rigidness in classical music. By classical, I'm using the more general term (ie. Mozart, Beethoven-type classical + baroque + romantic + 20th century).
Try to understand a Bach fugue, or a Beethoven sonata. The level of complexity does not compare. Take Gouryella - Ligaya for example. Sounds very classical, but it only has about what...32 bars of (one-note) melody repeated over 5 min, a chord change every 8 beats, etc.
I don't listen to EDM for the lyrical/stylistic aspect. I enjoy it because it's fun and catchy. I enjoy the sound engineering aspect of EDM, but hell no, I don't listen to it for musical intellectualism.
|
|
Jun-11-2006 04:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
Danny Ocean
Throwin' Shapes

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Absinthe Party at the Fly Honey Warehouse
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by cherrybarry
I completely agree. Just because it's instrumental doesn't mean it's classical. Just because you hear arpeggiation doesn't mean it's classical. Just because it's not pop doesn't mean it's classical.
Seriously, EDM is possibly the most rigid style of music ever. You're limited to a 4/4 beat at 120-140 bpms. Anything else isn't as danceable.
Plus, you're looping 4/8/16 beats over 3-8 minute intervals. It's the same phrase over and over again. The drumline gets repeated for 256 beats or whatever. You don't see that kind of rigidness in classical music. By classical, I'm using the more general term (ie. Mozart, Beethoven-type classical + baroque + romantic + 20th century).
Try to understand a Bach fugue, or a Beethoven sonata. The level of complexity does not compare. Take Gouryella - Ligaya for example. Sounds very classical, but it only has about what...32 bars of (one-note) melody repeated over 5 min, a chord change every 8 beats, etc.
I don't listen to EDM for the lyrical/stylistic aspect. I enjoy it because it's fun and catchy. I enjoy the sound engineering aspect of EDM, but hell no, I don't listen to it for musical intellectualism. |
this is the worst generalization ive heard. Its pretty naive to think that you won't find musical intellectualism in electronica.
|
|
Jun-11-2006 05:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
cherrybarry
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: soul train
|
|
|
did i not say i enjoy it for sound exploration? but that's not musical intellectualism in my book. ppl need to stop glorifying every single interest they have.
|
|
Jun-11-2006 06:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
Aquarian
king of no pants
Registered: May 2005
Location: Laval, Quebec
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by PETRAN
OH GOD....
HOW THE HELL can trance be compared to classical i still can't understand?!?!?!I mean...how the complex evolving harmonic arrangements(comprised by giant orchestras with each and every man playing a note or a sequence of notes at a specific time!) of Mozart, tchaikovsky, beethoven(vivaldi was a bit simpler but still complex), brahms and the even more complex epic symphonies of mahler, wagner, berlioz, brahms or the unpredictable impressionistic works of debussy (with the melody changing in unpredictable ways every 2 secs.)be compared to a 4-note(!) riff that arpeggiates, just because a random guy pressed the "arpeggiate" button in fl-studio or the other "tracker" think that mirco de govia produces over a 4-4 bit...THIS IS PURE HERESSY OMG!!!!!!!!!EVIL...Stop this madness now!!!Trance is just club music guys...nothing more nothing less... |
woops, did we tick off another classical snob?
I doubt you've ever really taken the time to analyse the complexity involved in both genres. Like most people you've just been brainwashed with this concept that composers like Mozart were like demi-gods and that classical music is superior and more 'intellectual' than all else. A concept not much different than the kind of DJ-worship that's often criticised on this board. Truth is - you wouldn't know musical genius if it hit you in the face, because you're stuck with this snobbist idea.
If you don't have anything intelligent to contribute, then don't. If you're going to spew your 1950's mentality then at least try and back it up with arguments and examples.
|
|
Jun-11-2006 06:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
Omega_Blue
Someone Changed My Custom

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Gone
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by cherrybarry
I completely agree. Just because it's instrumental doesn't mean it's classical. Just because you hear arpeggiation doesn't mean it's classical. Just because it's not pop doesn't mean it's classical.
Seriously, EDM is possibly the most rigid style of music ever. You're limited to a 4/4 beat at 120-140 bpms. Anything else isn't as danceable.
Plus, you're looping 4/8/16 beats over 3-8 minute intervals. It's the same phrase over and over again. The drumline gets repeated for 256 beats or whatever. You don't see that kind of rigidness in classical music. By classical, I'm using the more general term (ie. Mozart, Beethoven-type classical + baroque + romantic + 20th century).
Try to understand a Bach fugue, or a Beethoven sonata. The level of complexity does not compare. Take Gouryella - Ligaya for example. Sounds very classical, but it only has about what...32 bars of (one-note) melody repeated over 5 min, a chord change every 8 beats, etc.
I don't listen to EDM for the lyrical/stylistic aspect. I enjoy it because it's fun and catchy. I enjoy the sound engineering aspect of EDM, but hell no, I don't listen to it for musical intellectualism. |
i see your points, but man you are WAAAAAYYYY off in some respects. i listen to EDM for "musical intellectualism"
and generalizing all EDM into "You're limited to a 4/4 beat at 120-140 bpms." is just nonsense. EDM is by far the most eclectic genre of modern music today. that's why i listen to it.
some people think that music has to follow certain rules, and that's bullshit. music is music, regardless of what key, tempo, time sig., whatever is in. the ugliest, most dissonant sounding shit song is still music.
|
|
Jun-11-2006 07:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|