|
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Although, out of most of the PDD regulars, Lira seems to be the most interesting person to meet in real life. Always nice and friendly, and a gentleman, with interesting insight on the human condition (amongst other stuff). So I gotta ask you (Lira), what the hell is Russell Crowe doing in your avatar   ? |
He's disguised as Albert Camus 
(I'm flattered, by the way  )
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
an online discussion permits you:
- more time to re-evaluate your thoughts
- to phrase your words better
- to re-read the 'opponents' point aswell as any other related information as many times as you need (highly beneficial in my case, as my memory capacity is quite poor)
- to research the topic you're discussing as you're giving your opinion (being more educated)
- to detach from the discussion to keep your cool if needed (ashame not many use that ability)
an off-line discussion gives you:
- a lot more information to work with regarding the presentation and meaning of your 'opponent'
- quick responses
- the ability to determine whether you've 'won' or 'lost' the debate much sooner than in the online discussion
- ...err.. i think that's it
|
Although I don't really think debates are to be "won" or "lost", I do agree with you about the rest.
The reason why I posted this thread though, was because I was talking to my Philosophy professor about discussion forums, and e-learning (he's learning how to use Moodle). During the discussion, he said that the physical perception of others played an important factor in debating, which would be another advantage along with the speed you mentioned. That made me wonder, how would our discussion change, or would it happen at all?
I've seen others they mentioning they wouldn't probably discuss in real life, and I would only talk about philosophy - for example - in a very limited number of circunstances (although I've caught myself talking about it to random friends lately ).
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
as to the importance of body, i'd say the emoticons we use in a discussion could be compared to it, except that the emoticons permit few nuances in comparison with the body's endless amounts of them. in other words, it gives you the ability to express yourself more coherently. |
I'd say the intonation is also rather important (although that could easily be solved with the use of microphones )
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
and finally, as to what would happen if we were all to meet.. i'd say we'd have a lovely social gathering.. until someone would turn on the news . |
rolf 
| quote: | Originally posted by tathi
I love partying, socialising, drinking (among other stuff) and will do so every chance i get, but even though i have a large social network it's very rare that any of them will engage me on a topic such as politics, science, history, cultures, literature, et al. My circle of friends revolves around the clubbing scene so i'm much more likely to hear a conversation involving the roots of Chicago house, the direction Progressive is heading in, or how fucking shit Trance is currently than that of Politics.
I do enjoy discussing politics with others but i think that's because i'm always able to get my point accross more eloquently than others (ie. i almost always win the discussion ) but amongst the TA's here whom i believe know a shitload more than myself i'd probably become quiet and learn something! |
Yeah, I can relate to that. Naturally, since most of my friends don't listen to EDM, the main topics are usually about everyday life.
| quote: | Originally posted by tathi
I'd love to meet you Lira when i'm over in Brasil sometime next year, i'll probably jump on one of those uncomfortable (but cheap!) livestock buses and pump myself full of valium for the 40 hour trip |
Now that you mention it, I'd love to see one of those buses here... there are loads of them in movies, but I wonder whether they still exist
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
