 |
|
|
|
 |
Chronosis
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Málaga
|
|
|
Floating windows! (Session, Arrangement, Clip, Track, Browser)
I was really disappointed that they didn't incorporate this in Live 6. That would have made Live near perfect.
|
|
Oct-07-2006 09:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
mysticalninja
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
Oct-09-2006 10:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
jivamukti
tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Yoga
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by emc^2
Does anyone happen to have a first hand experience with Live 6? Is it worth the upgrade? What are some of the major features you say would make it worth the admission price?
|
IMO the only important feature is multiprocessor support. The rest range from nice (instrument rack) to useless (video support). They didn't expand MIDI capabilities or remove the annoying limitation that only the first 32 or so VST parameters are visible in the automation list, which is highly annoying. There are a few workarounds for this, but they're not perfect. Doh.
| quote: |
Also, my take on live 5 is that midi editing is not as flexible as say... Sonar. Keep in mind that my live 5 experience is "novice" and I may be missing something. has it been improved in live 6?
Thanks for feedback. |
No they didn't touch it. Yea there are few advanced MIDI features in Live (no flam, strum, staccato and the likes), but so far I haven't really missed them, and the quick and uncluttered GUI of Live is very important for me.
___________________
When rain dries, clouds form.
When clouds moisten, rain forms.
|
|
Oct-09-2006 16:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|