|
yeah, i don't think Freddie should have been made captain.
I've said somewhere else that his load is just too great being an allrounder and now captain, and from what people (English) have said he's not a good bowler manager, he'd be likely to try to bowl 40 overs a day himself and underutilise the spinners.
I find it funny that Mitchell Johnson is absolutely carted all over the place by the New Zealanders not even a year ago, but then he plays one good match in the DLF Cup and all of a sudden he's the next big thing. I am not convinced by him at all, he's gonna have to put in more consistently good performances in ODI's before I even suggest he earns half the praise he's gotten recently, and thats before he gets tried in a test. For the third bowler for us, I really think Clark is it at the moment, but then again I don't think he's 'there' either.
I reckon they need a rethink on Dizzy Gillespie, he has had a haircut and has returned better than he left. I said at the time that it was the dropping he had to have, he didn't look at all good for about 6 months before England, not as quick nor as much movement as we had seen earlier. Since he's come back though he has been moving the ball a lot more, which is great to see. He also seems to be more passionate about his cricket, he was back to his fearsome best last year in the state competition here and has also done very well in the Englsh county comps. Lets not forget a very good bowling effort and a 200 in his last test, true it was against the Bangers but it was still better than anyone else in the team.
Although, I don't think he'll come back in. And it'd be a big risk to do it. The third bowler is a problem for us I think. Tait would be interesting to look at, would love to see him in and scaring some batsmen but he's still injured from last year, still can't throw properly. Bracken maybe? He seems to be developing into the potential he's always shown.
Warney will go around again obviously, but who will be his partner in Sydney? MacGill is still the number 2 spinner in Aus, but will the selectors go for a risk and bring in Dan Cullen or Cullen Bailey? Dan (left arm off) and Cullen (left arm leg) are two promising young spinners, Dan has been touted as the next big thing post-Warne, but in the 'A' series a few months back in my opinion Bailey out bowled him. Having said that, MacGill needs to play for sure - depending on the pitch maybe in Adelaide too.
I also wish the selectors would get off the allrounder bandwagon. 7 batsmen and 4 bowlers with a couple of part timers is all we need. An allrounder should be selected on one of their trades alone, and you gotta say Watson is not a test batsman nor a test bowler. And Symonds is not a test player either. I don't know what it is about him, but I just don't lik ehim in the test team. That and I reckon his bowling is only a bit better than a part timer. Between Warne and Lee I think they can account for the batting of an allrounder, they're no muppets with the bat.
My Aussie test team:
Langer
Hayden
Ponting
Questionable (Martyn or maybe Jacques? Wouldn't mind seeing him get given a shot in the middle order)
Questionable (Give Clarke a few more years to mature, dunno who else though)
Hussey
Gilchrist
Warne
Lee
Clark
McGrath
If they have to play an allrounder, move Hussey to 5 and slide Watson or Symonds in at 6
That spinner Monty looks like he might be a bit of alright, probably wouldn't give our boys too much grief but you never know, he should do better than the King of Spain.
And maybe your selectors do have a clue, finally cutting Calamity Jones for Chris Read. For all the talk about Jones' batting he wasn't that flash, and you gotta have your best gloveman as a first priority.
Its a real shame that Vaughan won't be back in time, hopefully he does make it back at some time though, it would be a sorry tale if this ends his career. He's a class player and captain, doesn't deserve to go out with injury.
___________________
**Man I'm Pretty**
Last edited by Trance Nutter on Oct-14-2006 at 06:08
|