 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Lira
Ancient BassAddict

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sunsnail
Well actually that argument is flawed as well, because its illegal to commit suicide. So once you are born, you cannot legally choose not to go on with life. |
That's because I'm not talking about the legal system, but morality.
In that case, I shall add that I don't condemn suicide, given the fact that it's something the one chooses to do against oneself.
| quote: | Originally posted by Ivand
would you bring a child to the world knowing that you dont have the resources to maintain it? |
Well, there are several solutions to this...
1) Pregnancy takes 9 months, and during this time you have the time to rethink your professional life and engage in a new career. You can't know how your life is going to be 9 months from now, so you can't simply assume you won't have the resources to maintain the child.
2) Depending on your family, you could count on the help of parents. That's up to them to decide whether they're going to take part on this.
...
n) As a last resort, you could even think of giving the child away to adoption. But, claiming that there are no other solutions means you're simply acting on bad faith.
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
|
Dec-21-2006 05:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
1) Pregnancy takes 9 months, and during this time you have the time to rethink your professional life and engage in a new career. You can't know how your life is going to be 9 months from now, so you can't simply assume you won't have the resources to maintain the child.
2) Depending on your family, you could count on the help of parents. That's up to them to decide whether they're going to take part on this.
|
But cases exist in which neither of those options, nor many of the other ones that could be offered, are feasible. For a single woman already on welfare, possibly with a drug addiction, cast out from anything resembling family, to be able to raise a child is overly optimistic -- especially in an America where the face of abject poverty is a single mother with two kids and two minimum-wage jobs.
Again, I'm not arguing that abortion is ever an ideal. But as a last resort, sometimes it is the only rational choice to be made. Now, the longer this decision takes, the less likely I am to support it under any circumstance. I believe that all abortions can and should be conducted within the first trimester, well before any scientist has been able to establish significant signs of life.
___________________
|
|
Dec-21-2006 05:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lira
Ancient BassAddict

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
To me robbing someone of "choice" is not a problem in itself. The problem is that in not giving someone a choice with regard to their own life you may be forcing them to undergo an experience that is contrary to their will.
A fetus has no will, it only has the potential to develop into something that has a will - a "reasonable creature in being".
If the choice involved is something like circumcision, this involves pre-emptively making a decision that will permanently place a reasonable creature in being into a condition that he may not have chosen for himself had he the choice. Here robbing the creature of choice has caused it to undergo an experience against its will, for this reason the removal of choice or free will is wrong in this case.
In killing a fetus you are not forcing any reasonable creature in being to undergo any experience, let alone one contrary to its will. |
hhmm... the argument does seem sound, but I'm having some difficulty with the concept of a fetus having no will. Is the will to live a will? I've read reports on children trying to defend themselves from intra-uterine devices used for abortion, and I'm assuming that this is a pre-rational demonstration of a will to live.
My stance on this matter is that, given the fact that we don't have a indirect contact to the conscious of a fetus (through language, for example), I'd rather err on the safe side (i.e. that dodging from the devices is a way to "avoid harm").
ps.: By the way... is there a plural for the word "fetus"? I don't believe it's "feti" 
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
|
Dec-21-2006 06:02
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|