quote:

Originally posted by skip i remember there was a discussion on the dj mag poll one year here on ta. it was about who you voted for/will vote for. one guy said he's definitely gonna vote for leama & moor because they've rocked so much. some other dude pointed out that they don't even dj together. the guy voting for them said it doesn't matter, because to him they're the best djs because they produced such great tracks. my first reaction was: then just:

I think it's great that people start crediting the producers instead of dj's. alot of dj's earns alot for lousy work!
while producing a great track doesn't nessesearly make much profit at all.
If there was more money and honor in producing i think there would be much more gifted musicians producing trance (or it would be more seriousity in producing), and the scene would be on a taken to a higher level.
That's my thoughts anyway

___________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

i think we were talking about voting a bad dj just because he's a great producer

you can't compare a work of a dj with a work of a producer. there are two diferrent things on so many levels

I'm sure i posted in this thread, about the incest?

quote:

Originally posted by Soeder I think it's great that people start crediting the producers instead of dj's. alot of dj's earns alot for lousy work! while producing a great track doesn't nessesearly make much profit at all. If there was more money and honor in producing i think there would be much more gifted musicians producing trance (or it would be more seriousity in producing), and the scene would be on a taken to a higher level. That's my thoughts anyway

So you'd nominate someone for a Nobel prize because he's a good producer?

quote:

Originally posted by 1_last_breath you can't compare a work of a dj with a work of a producer. there are two diferrent things on so many levels

the point is that the dj depend on the producers and they won't be able to do their work properly with shitty productions.

quote:

So you'd nominate someone for a Nobel prize because he's a good producer?

no, wouldn't nominate a producer for the nobel prize.
If you think that's excactly the same thing, then that's you.

___________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

quote:

Originally posted by Soeder no, wouldn't nominate a producer for the nobel prize. If you think that's excactly the same thing, then that's you.

Considering the post you quoted, your opinion is that a good producer should receive a best DJ award. So I think my analogy is correct.

quote:

Originally posted by Soeder I think it's great that people start crediting the producers instead of dj's. alot of dj's earns alot for lousy work! while producing a great track doesn't nessesearly make much profit at all. If there was more money and honor in producing i think there would be much more gifted musicians producing trance (or it would be more seriousity in producing), and the scene would be on a taken to a higher level. That's my thoughts anyway

sure, i think producers should get more credit for their work. but that doesn't make the djs. so there's no point AT ALL to vote for them in a dj poll. even if the producer is a dj there's no point voting for him on a dj poll based on his productions, because the dj poll is about djing, not about producing.

___________________

Get Dropbox, with 250 MB extra space!

i get that point, but there's no public producer poll with many participants and media attention so it's not easy to credit producers any other way. It's not the best way to do it, but the way i see it, the only option. And they're allready nominated.

___________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

flame me if you like but this thread is the dumbest thing i have ever seen on these forums. EVER.

THIS THREAD F T L

___________________
FACEBOOK

bad children, bad