|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
yeah, i'm just not buying it. the Dems wanted wanted their power back back one way or another since 2000 and have been fairly scrupulous revising history, propping up hit men and generating shortsided hate among its young and ignorant far left base for years. |
And I thought my tin foil hat was on too tight.
| quote: | | after all that, it took 3000 dead American soldiers to give you a one seat Majority in the Senate by your logic. |
And a battle against a tightly controlled GOP majority with a sitting President in their pockets (or perhaps the other way around would be more correct).
And try not to count out the 31-seat pickup in Congress, if you will sir. You must have also conveniently forgotten that not one Democratic incumbent lost his seat. And you criticize us of revisionist history? Tisk tisk.
Oh yeah, we also picked up more governor and State Congressional seats as well.
And it only gets worse for you wingnuts in 2008 as you have substantially more seats to defend vs. the Democrats. Thanks, I like my logic very much.
| quote: | | if i'm playing the victim card then you should remember one thing, you've got the inurgency, Zawahiri, Ahmadeninijad on your side...as Leslie Nielson once said; "good luck, we're all counting on you." |
Ahh I see, by that extremist logic I suppose you have al Qaeda and Iran on your side? Or perhaps you are on their side? Because in all reality, bin Laden has nothing but high praise for your ill-planned invasion in Iraq, and Iran has nothing but sincere gratitude for installing a fundamentalist Shiite regime with close ties to their own country.
Now which extremist logic makes more sense?
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|