|
Might as well put in my two cents. Stats on my drives:
- 1 x 18 GB, 1 x 27 GB, 1 x 36 GB Western Digital IDE, taken out of commission because they weren't big enough. Each ran from 3-4 years, never failed or reported errors.
- 3 x 160 GB Seagate IDE, running for ~3 years, no failures.
- 1 x 200 GB Seagate SATA, ran for ~2 years, started reporting SMART errors, had to send in for RMA.
- 1 x 250 GB Seagate SATA, running for ~1 year, no problems.
- 1 x 500 GB Seagate SATA, bought to replace failing 200 GB, passed all diagnostics but system refused to boot from it. I think the boot sector is damaged in a way that the diagnostics can't detect.
- 1 x 500 GB Western Digital SATA, bought to replace defective Seagate SATA (the Seagate was bought online so there was no time to go through the return process), running for ~2 months with no problems and performs significantly faster with large files/swap files than any of the others.
So it's a bit of a crap shoot with hard drives these days. I know a lot of people have horror stories about Western Digital drives, but so far, all my problems have been with Seagate, which I used to think was the best. Somebody actually did benchmarks on the new 500 GB drives as well, and showed in several tests that the WDs really do perform better in most cases.
Also, Seagate offers a good warranty but I now know firsthand that their service department can be a bitch to reach - their operating hours are best described as "whenever you're not home". I managed to squeeze my RMA through their tech support department with a little bit of persuasive effort, but some people might not be so lucky.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|