 |
|
|
|
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
You don't need a keyboard to compose melodies. For hundreds of years, composers created full orchestral suites with nothing but a leaky fountain pen and some staff paper. If you understand the theory, then you already know how something is going to sound before you "play" it.
Keyboards are great for improvising and I don't think I'd want to try to produce without one at this point, but then again I'm trying to produce funkier tracks these days and have much less solid knowledge in that area.
I don't generally post old-ass tracks - this one's from 2005, the mixing is rather shitty and the 2-minute intro is lame, but I think it should serve quite well to debunk the "keyboard required" argument (I produced it long before I had a keyboard):
Flashback
I don't expect anybody to be impressed by that, but I'd love to hear anyone try to say that it has no melody or a poorly-written melody.
Even today, almost all my percussion is sequenced, not recorded. Maybe if I had a drum pad I'd record it, but honestly, I've got enough gear for the moment.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
May-24-2007 22:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Rhythm
The piano has always been elemental to composition, but I do know that Beethoven could create the frameworks of movements in his head.
Beyond the whole sequences of sounds, I think it's the masterful layering of instrumentation that is brilliant in classical works. Unless one is a genius like Beethoven was, who could compose while deaf, this is impossible for most people. I start my songs with a concept of what I want to do, but certainly not a blueprint like Beethoven 
For me, using a keyboard to feel out melodies is much more natural than drawing notes on a screen. But again, to each his own. |
Yeah to each his own, I agree, but I think I should point out a few things, first that Beethoven was deaf, second, that I don't like Beethoven and would never want to sound like him. Actually, I don't like most classical music, I find it soulless and boring, like a lot of trance these days. There are a few distinct exceptions, which I love. So all these people talking about the genius of Beethoven isn't very convincing to me, which isn't to say its wrong, just not very convincing to me.
I guess this whole thing's just about how people like to compose and what style of music they like. I like really big chords and melodies, I was a pianist and I play a handful of other instruments to boot. So I come at things from that point of view to start. As opposed to some others, who either make music which is not at all centred on melody or make it in a non traditional way because they learnt to play a sequencer before they learnt to play a conventional instrument.
My main question about how your going to get results out of a sequencer without a keyboard is, how on earth are you going to get adequate detail? If you program at a 16th triplets level, you'll be there all day! When I play keyboard I often play at this level (or 32nds), so programming at say, a 16th level is going to sound robotic etc. This is one reason I often find it helpful to get a drum line out on a keyboard rather than drawing it.
Diginut, I really like this track of yours, and the melody is great, but you can really tell its done in a sequencer I think, although it sounds great, it doesn't have an organic feel like you need a piano for sometimes. Maybe not all the time, but definitely for some things. So it still doesn't prove that you don't need a piano at all, but maybe not for some things, yes, I concede.
| quote: | | i do and i make some trance. tho i suck at melodies but it has nothing to do with midikeyboard or not, beacuse i bought one a year ago, and since then i have not made any melodies at all. it doesnt work for me, im not a pianist. and ALOT make trance without a midikeyboard, they rather draw a chord and adds an arpegiator lol. |
Yes, you suck at melodies, you only make "some" trance, you're not a pianist and you use arps to make your music. That's almost the definition of what people whinged about when this scene started, "the computers make the music for them". Sorry again, now I'm being an arse, but I hate arpegiated stuff when people just let it run. I make arps on the keyboard myself, because I think it gives stuff a more organic and interesting sound, as well as allowing more variation and improvisation. And OF COURSE you don't need a keyboard because you "suck at melody" in the first place! So how would you use it??
| quote: | | i can see you hammer that midikeyboard fast as hell to make hihats. |
Yes, I'm like a speeding bullet Have you never noticed a little thing called a tempo control? Slow it down, record, speed it up, voila. Also works for arps. I was probably a bit strong on saying you MUST have a keyboard for beats, but I find it infinitely helpful, I wouldn't have been able to work out half my beats if it wasn't for that. But I do often use the piano roll for this as well. Thanks for leaving my spelling mistakes in btw...
| quote: | | You don't need a keyboard to compose melodies. For hundreds of years, composers created full orchestral suites with nothing but a leaky fountain pen and some staff paper. If you understand the theory, then you already know how something is going to sound before you "play" it. |
Like I said, I can't stand much classical music, because it seems soulless to me, almost like the person writing didn't (or couldn't) hear what they were making
I could have picked quotes from half the posts here to pick on, its really nothing personal to anyone in here, I just disagree is all, I think that the rot sets in in most music when people stop writing it on instruments and start doing it "in their heads"/ in a sequencer. Sorry for the long post too, but I had a lot of ranting to do.
|
|
May-26-2007 14:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by kitphillips
Diginut, I really like this track of yours, and the melody is great, but you can really tell its done in a sequencer I think, although it sounds great, it doesn't have an organic feel like you need a piano for sometimes. |
While that's completely true, it's not mechanical because I didn't have a keyboard, it's mechanical because it was made while I was still new to producing and didn't really know how to humanize well. Besides, we're no longer talking about composition and melodies anymore, we're talking about recording and execution, which is an entirely different ballgame and not the substance of my original post at all. 
To compose, you do not need a keyboard; most production, especially trance, is supposed to sound mechanical anyway. If you want to make organic and humanized sounds, then yes, it's going to be a whole lot easier if you record it live, using a keyboard or some other MIDI instrument. Of course, if you had said that instead, you would have had a lot less blowback on it.
As for your comment that classical music sounds soulless and boring, you're certainly entitled to your opinion; I just wonder what you're comparing to. Surely not trance! Jazz, funk, blues maybe?
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
May-26-2007 16:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
While that's completely true, it's not mechanical because I didn't have a keyboard, it's mechanical because it was made while I was still new to producing and didn't really know how to humanize well. Besides, we're no longer talking about composition and melodies anymore, we're talking about recording and execution, which is an entirely different ballgame and not the substance of my original post at all. 
To compose, you do not need a keyboard; most production, especially trance, is supposed to sound mechanical anyway. If you want to make organic and humanized sounds, then yes, it's going to be a whole lot easier if you record it live, using a keyboard or some other MIDI instrument. Of course, if you had said that instead, you would have had a lot less blowback on it.
As for your comment that classical music sounds soulless and boring, you're certainly entitled to your opinion; I just wonder what you're comparing to. Surely not trance! Jazz, funk, blues maybe? |
Yeah I'm comparing to blues and rock etc. but definately some trance as well, to me, its not just a matter of execution to use a piano or midi controller, its also a matter of being able to write and hear immediate feedback, rather than writing in a totally abstract sense and then listening back and adjusting. Maybe this works for some people, but not me, like I said a difference in working, I guess I assumed that everyone worked like me!
|
|
May-27-2007 11:04
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|