 |
|
|
|
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkyCrew
I think initial research like that is good enough to be a little more cautious |
Fan of the precautionary principle, are you? None for me, thanks - I'll stick with my cell phones, computer monitors, plastic wrap, McDonald's cheeseburgers, aerosol deodorant, microwave ovens, aspartame, tuna fish and salmon, tylenol, tap water, dental fillings, Windex, insecticide, prescription drugs and vaccines, Alar, sugar, asbestos, potato chips, herbicides, red meat, soap, food dye, toothpaste, and yes, even testicle heating.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
May-25-2007 21:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
Cosmic Fur
Debbie Downer

Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Mississauga, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Fan of the precautionary principle, are you? None for me, thanks - I'll stick with my cell phones, computer monitors, plastic wrap, McDonald's cheeseburgers, aerosol deodorant, microwave ovens, aspartame, tuna fish and salmon, tylenol, tap water, dental fillings, Windex, insecticide, prescription drugs and vaccines, Alar, sugar, asbestos, potato chips, herbicides, red meat, soap, food dye, toothpaste, and yes, even testicle heating. |
lol, how long did it take you to come up with that list?
Quite thorough. ^5.
___________________
I'm the trouble starter, fuckin' instigator.
I'm the fear-addicted, danger illustrated.
|
|
May-25-2007 21:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
FunkyCrew
Ukranian Import

Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Soul Shakin'
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Fan of the precautionary principle, are you? None for me, thanks - I'll stick with my cell phones, computer monitors, plastic wrap, McDonald's cheeseburgers, aerosol deodorant, microwave ovens, aspartame, tuna fish and salmon, tylenol, tap water, dental fillings, Windex, insecticide, prescription drugs and vaccines, Alar, sugar, asbestos, potato chips, herbicides, red meat, soap, food dye, toothpaste, and yes, even testicle heating. |
impressive list indeed!
___________________
Just surrender yourself to the rhythm,
With your hands up in the sky,
Feel the energy deep inside your system
And leave this world behind...
|
|
May-25-2007 21:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
Orko
Digital Hippie

Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Ultraportables suck ass. Wimpy performance, no battery life, and run hot enough to burn your lap if you actually leave it there. |
You are using the ultra portable for the wrong reason then. Small laptops should never be complete replacements for what a desktop can do, and when used properly, they are not.
Such small laptops allow you to do specialized tasks in any environment, with a minimum of equipment to carry. The laptop which I showed does everything I want it to do for school. I can configure networks, program, and do word processing, all with minimal power (P2-266). And, after I replace the batteries, I should have up to a 5hr life span on a single charge. When paired with the right operating system, and choice of software, I would take ultra-portable over ultra-capable, and some what portable.
If I need to do any movie, audio, or graphic editing, I can wait till i get home to use my a more powerful computer.
|
|
May-25-2007 22:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ Chrono
HTML is not allowed.

Registered: Jan 2002
Location: toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Ultraportables suck ass. Wimpy performance, no battery life, and run hot enough to burn your lap if you actually leave it there. |
14 Hour expected battery life.
source
And in my experience, it's actually been the opposite. Ultra-portables have higher batter life, no? I've got a very non-portable Inspirion 9100, weighs like 10lbs and has a batter life of under 2 hours. Not only that, but it runs very hot, and needs fans blasting at full speed to cool itself most of the time.. I forget the model number, but the more portable inspirion that is essentially the same as the 9100, but different processor and smaller body, had a battery life that was over twice as long. And alot quieter.
Last edited by DJ Chrono on May-26-2007 at 02:07
|
|
May-26-2007 02:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Chrono
14 Hour expected battery life. |
Bahahahaha... as if. I guess they can claim anything they want before the thing is actually developed!
| quote: | | And in my experience, it's actually been the opposite. Ultra-portables have higher batter life, no? I've got a very non-portable Inspirion 9100, weighs like 10lbs and has a batter life of under 2 hours. Not only that, but it runs very hot, and needs fans blasting at full speed to cool itself most of the time.. I forget the model number, but the more portable inspirion that is essentially the same as the 9100, but different processor and smaller body, had a battery life that was over twice as long. And alot quieter. |
You haven't specified what was in the ultra-portable, but the Inspiron 9100 uses a Pentium 4 and other horribly inefficient components, whereas I'm going to guess that the ultraportable you're talking about uses a Centrino (Core Duo or Pentium M) and integrated graphics, both of which deliver much better performance at much higher power efficiency; hence less heat, less noise, and more battery life. The difference in computing has been extremely noticeable, especially in the laptop world, ever since Intel abandoned the sinking ship of the P4.
Ultraportables have lower battery life by definition because they have smaller batteries. It's just common sense. You can't compare the new UPs with older tanks because the technology is completely different.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
May-26-2007 02:56
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:30.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|