|
| quote: | Originally posted by NeoPhono
Call me idealistic, but I have a simple method of determining whether or not I believe a ban or admission policy to be just; if it were reversed, would we think it to be fair? I believe that discrimination is discrimination, regardless if it is against a minority or majority group. As said before, if a bar opened up and had an openly anti-gay, anti-black, anti-Jew, or anti-any other minority group, we'd be outraged. But as long as it's an anti-majority group, we seem fine with it? I feel you can't have it both ways. Yes, minority groups need protection, but this is not a case of that. This is not an attempt to keep homosexuals safe, it's an attempt to remove an inconvenience in allowing "breeders" to participate. |
It's not just 'breeders' though.
I read today that this ban includes Lesbians...
The only way I can see this working out is if they made it into a private club with actual membership.
I know this doesn't solve the arguments of discrimination, but at least the club would have a determining criteria in which to argue with rather than barring up what was a public place.
___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."
|