Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > DJM-800 vs Xone:92 vs Xone:3D
Pages (7): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
RJT
last minute disco



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
I don't think the upfaders on the Xone's are bad at all!

I had (still have actually) the 92 rotary, just got the 3D. Would've preferred the rotaries, but really the upfaders are pretty damn nice.

They seem to be good enough for PVD and Digweed, so we shouldn't be complaining


It's only the faders on the 92 that are shit, and I call them so solely because of how fucking loose they are. Honestly, they feel incredibly cheap compared to the rest of the mixer.

A&H should have used the same faders they did on the 62 on the 92.

And you should know by now that the "they're good enough for (big dj name here)" argument is a load of bollocks - look how many of those ******s still use the MDRV700's


___________________
last minute disco dot net

Old Post Jun-28-2007 13:39 
Click Here to See the Profile for RJT Click here to Send RJT a Private Message Visit RJT's homepage! Add RJT to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Haha, I have MDRV-700's... mine haven't snapped in half yet, but I'm waiting!

The fader stiffness thing is preference though. They are most certainly NOT cheap faders. Never touched a 62 though... so can't comment.

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
It's only the faders on the 92 that are shit, and I call them so solely because of how fucking loose they are. Honestly, they feel incredibly cheap compared to the rest of the mixer.

A&H should have used the same faders they did on the 62 on the 92.

And you should know by now that the "they're good enough for (big dj name here)" argument is a load of bollocks - look how many of those ******s still use the MDRV700's

Old Post Jun-28-2007 13:50  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Alex Barretta
Junior tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn

Of the three I prefer the DJM800 only because of the comfort level and ease of use. Excellent EQ's and effects that if used right are magical. Ive tried the A&H, and the 4 eqs part...... thats just silly. And rotary is available on both those mixers (right?) so there really is no comparison for me. You can also add better looking as a plus for Pio!

Old Post Jun-28-2007 14:37  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Alex Barretta Click here to Send Alex Barretta a Private Message Add Alex Barretta to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK

quote:
Originally posted by Alex Barretta
Of the three I prefer the DJM800 only because of the comfort level and ease of use. Excellent EQ's and effects that if used right are magical. Ive tried the A&H, and the 4 eqs part...... thats just silly. And rotary is available on both those mixers (right?) so there really is no comparison for me. You can also add better looking as a plus for Pio!


4 eq's isn't silly when you get used to them


___________________
::::: DjTrig.Com :::::
Afterward - July 2009 Mix

Old Post Jun-28-2007 16:13  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for agentdansmith Click here to Send agentdansmith a Private Message Visit agentdansmith's homepage! Add agentdansmith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Yohan
Champion of Deep&Nu-disco



Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont, Soviet Canuckistan

quote:
Originally posted by agentdansmith
4 eq's isn't silly when you get used to them

Yep. My transitions are 20x more smoother with 4 eqs.


___________________
Latest mix: Yohan - Full Spectrum (Fall 14 promo)
Like my stuff? Join my FB group here!
quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny.
quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded

Old Post Jun-28-2007 16:57  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Yohan Click here to Send Yohan a Private Message Add Yohan to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Uhh, they shouldn't be.

EQ's aren't even required to mix perfectly, pick the right tracks and learn level control.

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Yep. My transitions are 20x more smoother with 4 eqs.

Old Post Jun-28-2007 17:02  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Yohan
Champion of Deep&Nu-disco



Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont, Soviet Canuckistan

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
Uhh, they shouldn't be.

EQ's aren't even required to mix perfectly, pick the right tracks and learn level control.

I suck, obvious.

So much that I need 4 eqs to feel like I'm a superstar DJ


___________________
Latest mix: Yohan - Full Spectrum (Fall 14 promo)
Like my stuff? Join my FB group here!
quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny.
quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded

Old Post Jun-28-2007 17:25  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Yohan Click here to Send Yohan a Private Message Add Yohan to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
s3nate
Choklit Reignnnnn



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver

Sooner or later mixers are going to be like those razors. First with 3 EQs, then 4, 5, 6..... and so on.

Old Post Jun-28-2007 18:57  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for s3nate Click here to Send s3nate a Private Message Add s3nate to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Clovis
techno jungle shit



Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
You aren't biased at all with that avatar

Hehe, I like the Xone's too. The build quality and solidness just isn't the same on the Pio's, though the 800/1000 is much better than their previous mixers.



I disagree, I'd even much rather play on a DJM-600 than an 800. The EQ curves on the 800 are horrible to me, and I hate the ridiculously bass-heavy sound it has. Even with sony 7506 the bass in the cans is just ridiculous. The effects are nice and the faders are smooth, but the filter is nothing like the xone's.

The 92 Rotary has to be one of the nicest mixers I've ever played on, though I heard the Rane is comparable if not even smoother.

I just love the EQing on the 92, and the cue sound setup is very nicely done too.

Old Post Jun-29-2007 00:57  France
Click Here to See the Profile for Clovis Click here to Send Clovis a Private Message Visit Clovis's homepage! Add Clovis to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

I was just referring to the build quality actually...

I'm gonna miss the rotaries of my 92... maybe I should just keep it

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
I disagree, I'd even much rather play on a DJM-600 than an 800. The EQ curves on the 800 are horrible to me, and I hate the ridiculously bass-heavy sound it has. Even with sony 7506 the bass in the cans is just ridiculous. The effects are nice and the faders are smooth, but the filter is nothing like the xone's.

The 92 Rotary has to be one of the nicest mixers I've ever played on, though I heard the Rane is comparable if not even smoother.

I just love the EQing on the 92, and the cue sound setup is very nicely done too.

Old Post Jun-29-2007 01:00  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
RJT
last minute disco



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
I disagree, I'd even much rather play on a DJM-600 than an 800. The EQ curves on the 800 are horrible to me, and I hate the ridiculously bass-heavy sound it has. Even with sony 7506 the bass in the cans is just ridiculous. The effects are nice and the faders are smooth, but the filter is nothing like the xone's.

The 92 Rotary has to be one of the nicest mixers I've ever played on, though I heard the Rane is comparable if not even smoother.

I just love the EQing on the 92, and the cue sound setup is very nicely done too.


I really, really want to get a chance to play on a rotary 92.

And Rane mixers are definitely comparable - I'd say even better in build quality than Xones.

I've played on an empath, rotary, empath rotary, and the t1-SSL (or whatever the one with Serato built in is), and all of them felt like absolute fucking tanks.

Best feeling mixers I've ever played on, for sure.


___________________
last minute disco dot net

Old Post Jun-29-2007 01:09 
Click Here to See the Profile for RJT Click here to Send RJT a Private Message Visit RJT's homepage! Add RJT to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Clovis
techno jungle shit



Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
I really, really want to get a chance to play on a rotary 92.

And Rane mixers are definitely comparable - I'd say even better in build quality than Xones.

I've played on an empath, rotary, empath rotary, and the t1-SSL (or whatever the one with Serato built in is), and all of them felt like absolute fucking tanks.

Best feeling mixers I've ever played on, for sure.



The best set I ever heard Lawler play was @ Avalon on an MP2016, his EQing and beatmatching that night were some of the finest I've ever heard by someone using 3 CDJs and an EFX unit.

Old Post Jun-29-2007 01:17  France
Click Here to See the Profile for Clovis Click here to Send Clovis a Private Message Visit Clovis's homepage! Add Clovis to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > DJM-800 vs Xone:92 vs Xone:3D
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (7): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHard trance tune from mid to late 90's. [2015] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackEor - The Hard Shit [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 15:54.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!