Originally posted by Dean Millson and it is all because the enormous multinational recording companies who earn billions have not been making the same profits due to illegal down loads. Please consider
___________________
This is trance...
Jose Amnesia - The Eternal (Pulser Remix) / Chicane - Saltwater / Photon Project - Illumination / Gouryella - Tenshi / Altitude - Altitude (SHOKK Remix) / Rank 1 - Airwave / The Thrillseekers - Synaesthesia (En Motion Mix)
Jul-11-2007 03:36
promowhore
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: VaginaTown
quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
It's actually not APRA when you read it, it's the PPCA which was set up to represent the labels i believe. How surprising...
Yes, but the APRA pay through is based on what ARIA tell them is getting played (as per their data that they chose to release). The majority of ARIA directors are made up from the 4 majors. Who do you think they will be looking after ?
There is no accurate way to pay though this income on what is actually getting played in clubs, until every dj in every club submits a weekly play sheet.
Even if they did, the increase is well and truely out of line.
Jul-11-2007 03:40
Dean Millson
MC
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Below the bassline...
mate, i agree with you
___________________
Pretty Simple;
Saturdays at Ffour.
Jul-11-2007 03:46
Nsonic
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2004
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Marcus at Ffour
If you take the same venue open an average of 3 nights a week the cost per annum is $65,520 - up from $4368.
The former number eats the latter. huge
so...what does all this mean for the clubbers and DJs?
Jul-11-2007 05:52
kittn
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Hobart
quote:
Originally posted by Nsonic
so...what does all this mean for the clubbers and DJs?
Ideally the clubs will charge a few dollars more in cover charge rather than skimping somewhere else or worse, shutting down. I hope they don't assume that clubbers "won't" pay slightly more. I'd sure as hell rather pay an extra $5, if the alternative is some shitty cover band at a pub or an RnB superclub.. ugh. Shudder.
___________________
Jul-11-2007 08:23
rza
tranceaddict in training
Registered: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
I think the most interesting part of this is that most of the music played in the clubs that we all go too comes from overseas, not from local artists. So who is actually therefore getting the money from the $1 per person? Certainly not the artists who produce most of the music.
in a nutshell..
quote:
from inthemix.com.au
"After operating costs, the Phonographic Performance Company distributes half the money to record labels and the other half to Australian artists. This is based on the current ARIA Dance Charts. Those venues that play a more 'underground' or non-commercial style of music will effectively be paying for top 40 artists when they're not even playing their music!" this makes me sick. the artists i am going out to hear and support will not even benefit from me paying more, instead i will putting cash in the pockets of the major labels to further saturate the market with the music found on the ARIA dance chart? http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/....asp?chart=1D20
___________________
If ur not wasted.. then ur day is..
Originally posted by kittn
I'd sure as hell rather pay an extra $5, if the alternative is some shitty cover band at a pub or an RnB superclub.. ugh. Shudder.
..or a decent aus band for around $15, and they get a "good" cut of that.
___________________
Jul-11-2007 16:27
Rusty O'Hara
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Here, Now
quote:
Originally posted by James Brooke
yeah it sucks but there isn't much we can do about it...
There is a lot that can be done about it. Shrugging of shoulders and saying "not much we can do" is obviously the worst course of action.
Jul-12-2007 00:28
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location:
Who gives a shit?
Future will raise ticket prices to all their events by $2.80.
Originally posted by Dean Millson
I think the most interesting part of this is that most of the music played in the clubs that we all go too comes from overseas, not from local artists. So who is actually therefore getting the money from the $1 per person? Certainly not the artists who produce most of the music.
Depends on which places you go, and what sort of music you go to?
I've been to events that are 100% local music. The income from that based to artists based on this scheme is basically being analysed on the basis of the ARIA Dance Chart. So, say there was a theoretical $100 kitty from that one event, and none of these artists are on the ARIA charts, TV Rock and Rogue Traders get all the royalties, how does that work?
Jul-12-2007 00:42
Dean Millson
MC
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Below the bassline...
That's exactly how it works by the sounds of it.
Hence why i'm rather skeptical about the whole thing. This seems like the easiest model for the majors to make a grab for cash, not the best model to support artists.
___________________
Pretty Simple;
Saturdays at Ffour.