 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
basilisk
Ektoplazm

Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
um, which is why we write the key on our tracks perhaps?? "doing your research" does not equate with using ripoff software like mixed in key. my ears are cheaper and far more accurate. |
Sure, but where do you see me advocating using mixed in key? I don't think it's any good. RE2 is the way to go. The time saved in automation makes it far superior to some kind of old-fashioned system involving a notebook at a keyboard. Not only that, but there are collaborative possibilities that I suspect most people don't even consider.
I find that proper harmonic mixing necessitates having lots of options. Simply because a track seems compatible (complimentary key and close in tempo) doesn't mean it is going to blend--the production quality, energy level, style, or some other factor could cause an issue. Additionally, I play many styles of psytrance and progressive in different sets. As a result, I need a lot of tracks keyed and analyzed. Currently my database has about 10,000 tracks (incidentally, with RE2 all of this data is publicly accessible through the shared server).
RE2 is smartly designed. I use it to automatically analyze the keys of tracks that I import into the database. Questions of accuracy have always plagued harmonic mixing software. You will read, in different places, all sorts of different results. In my experience, RE2 is 80%+ accurate. Last year some friends and I ran our own tests using a variety of psytrance releases old and new. We keyed by ear and also automated the process to find out just how accurate RE2 could be. On the average 9 track album, only one would typically have been analyzed improperly. In those instances, the "key accuracy" field usually had a low rating, so even the program knew something was up. Knowing this, one can run through and manually key tracks with low accuracy counts to improve the quality of the database. In most cases where the key was analyzed wrong, the song featured one or more key changes. RE2 is only set to uncover one key at this stage in its development, but there is an option to specify an ending key as well as the starting key. In these cases, it's just a matter of busting out the internal piano and doing some verification. I do some of that anyway, simply to increase the accuracy of the information in the database. This is what I mean by smart design: the automated analysis is good to begin with, and the program also provides for manual verification and easy updating.
Years ago I used to keep notebooks and slips of paper around my decks to mark down when a mix really worked out. Now I just use the mix-out feature in RE2 to record a connection between tracks in the database. Any time I practise or get into composing a mix I end up making what feels like real progress. When I find songs that are simply made for each other, not only do I record this in my RE2 database, but (this is the cool part) anyone else with those same songs can access my notes. What we're looking at here is open source DJing--collaborative networking of information that anyone can benefit from... as far as I'm concerned, it's brilliant. Too bad it is so poorly understood. But I like the idea that all my practise sessions go on record now. Whatever information I find--whatever networks I create--that data is saved. The informational complexity of the universe increases.
So, if you want to stick with a piano and a notebook and sort things out the hard way, be my guest. As for me, I'm going to continue to explore what the future has to offer.
|
|
Jul-18-2007 02:05
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|