 |
|
|
|
 |
Mane
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Poland, Szczecin
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by palm
this is like famous people would have to pay for wearing clothes' brands. maybe. just a thought. the dj is actualy doing free promotion for you so show some respect. the djs are VERY important to this scene. |
I know they are important but for instance if they would pay 1euro for 1 track like in digital shops and playing about 30 tracks per night is just 30 euro from i dont know 1000 euro fee? taking that from hundreds of djs would bring the amount of money producers should get and i think this would bring more balance between dj - producing
___________________
crowdfunding for my new album on vinyl
|
|
Dec-14-2007 21:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
Jimb0b
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2007
Location:
|
|
|
I was personally thinking of big events such as trance energy etc... where there is quite a lot of people attending / cash.
It would probablly be impossible to implement etc..., but it would just be nice in theory for producers to be paid a little amount when there tracks are played at these big events.
|
|
Dec-14-2007 22:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
|
Dec-15-2007 10:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lolo
I play Trance no Dance

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brussels, Belgium
|
|
|
this is the very first time I don't entirely agree with john's ideas about this.
I have to admit that facts being cited are the exact truth, though. John is an extremely good friend, also a reliable partner, and no doubt he has a point here. But I'd like to add my two cents on how it feels for me.
You all know how it ruined my soul back in the dark days. To be honest, it should have opened my eyes on a situation that was NOT brand new, happily enough I got to open them after all.
People gave up budgets they had for music in favor of every single kind of gadget,mobile phones and ringtones that money can buy, or movies, or other media (video games anyone??). Their point of interests have changed, and some call that priority-switching but that's just one of those factors.
The costs have increased horribly, especially in Western Europe. For example, bread costs now 2 Euros here while it was 1 Euro 25, this ten years ago. Same with every single basic product, fuel here in Belgium, 1,35 Euro a liter of Euro 95, while it didn't cost 90 cents in 1997.
And not to forget that the internet is a monthly cost to put on top of that. What was a weird thing back in 97 is now a basic need for many of us...
And, finally, there's that thing, online sharing, that lets you download songs you like in a compressed format, mpeg 1 layer 3. It's fast, easy as one-two-three.
Of course everyone needs to know that this remains illegal, and that I don't encourage illegal sharing 24/7 without buying anything.
That said, what do people really share "illegaly"?? Most of the time, mtv and radio stuff that's being played 20 times a day. And here I totally agree with John, it doesn't harm the company when you share this kind of music. And again, I agree with John when he says that it harms us, as we're the first victims of that crisis, we the indies, you know, the guys who run this business out of passion??
And here comes my point of disagreement. Fact is, WHY do WE have to pay for that? Why do the madonna's and britneys all over the world get plays 20 times a day on mtv?? Why do record companies invest so much, like 1m us$ while you can invest 10 000 in a hundred new artists? Why does it have to affect us?
And further, fact is, if an artist needs a 100 000 us$ video investment to generate a lot of sales, if this has been done by hundreds of artists signed by universal, bmg, sony, emi, warner, if all of them just do a break-even, well people get used to get fed like ducks for their meat. So, they don't see the millions of people willing to share their passion for music.
Today sees us live one of the most important failures of the whole system in a century. Media-based marketing on art has shown its limits. Whether you paint, photograph landscapes, make small movies, or cool music you're happy with, in order to do for a living what you were made for, you need so much marketing... unbearable for the most of us.
Again, we get treated like sheep because all of those brands just invest so much money.
Something that the world forgot. You can influence people, but you cannot alter their tastes.
So, here's my conclusion.
We should admit that fighting sales that decrease, while we're 6 billion people on earth, and while 2 billion and a half don't even get access to our art because they don't even have anything to eat, is quite ridiculous.
We should consider this every single time we make something, and everyone in the music industry should keep this in mind.
That would at least make some of us a lot more humble, a lot less self-sufficient, and also that would make us happier after all. This is what the Flower-power movement was made of back in the end-60's-70's.
God only knows what's gonna happen. Budgets allowed for every record could decrease, that would be great for the thousands of promising records remaining unsigned and unheard. Or some might figure out something incredible to revolutionize the face of the music industry.
In fact, it depends on us, you know, the middle-class. In a way, people need our money so much, that we might dictate whatever we want. It's harsh to say, but we haven't made good use of so much power, YET.
"I'd rather save an 3rd world-kid from death than sell 1000 000 cd's. Because after all, money won't make us happy." This is something that Armin van Buuren for example (and just as an example), or every single well- or over- paid artist in our scene (depends how you consider them, right, not a personal opinion here), should think about before acting or performing.
How are we going to explain our kids that soon out of 2 kids on earth, one will die from lack of nutrition because a dj gets 20-35 000 Euros for 2 hours?? or even 6000 euros? It's as simple as that for me. It's how richness (not money, but richness in general) is inequally being distributed on earth.
So, let's remain humble guys with a passion for music. That's what all of us agree with after all. Like painting, writing books, making movies, it's just art being made by craftsmen. The day we die, only what we've done to make the world better really will matter.
___________________
Http://www.airwave-music.com is my new site. Djairwave.com is no more. A new era has begun
|
|
Dec-16-2007 08:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
Wow, thats certainly something to think on Lolo... I certainly agree with you that money doesn't buy happiness, but I would love for 1000 people to buy my CDs, only because it would mean that hopefully I'm giving them happiness... But I guess when your starving or your family's died of AIDS, then music maybe isn't much consolation.
I think one reason people have run away from music to put money into other things, is that they aren't exposed to music worth buying. Also, prices are ridiculous, especially when most of the time you've never heard the songs on the record before, due to it never being played on the radio. You're basically spending $50 on an item of completely unknown quality, thats a real leap of faith. Also, I find that a lot of people just don't listen to music anymore. Whenever I hang out with friends all they ever do is turn the music down till you can hardly hear it. For those people it doesn't matter whether its britney or Deadmau5, its just background chatter.
I think you've hit something with the amount spent on the few these days. Spending 1 mil on an artist just isn't fair when others are getting nothing. If music can't sell itself without a video, then maybe its not worth even producing. These days the artist isn't really about the music they make, they have become a BRAND. A clothing line, a perfume, a video. Thats what the 360 degree deals are all about. Labels just often aren't interested in music anymore, only image and how they can use it to sell hard material goods - the sort of goods which can't be downloaded.
I hope one day in the future audiences will be able to find music which appeals to them, music which moves them. I hope that artists will be paid for making that music, and be able to continue making it without any concern for where their next meal is coming from. But I don't know how or if that is ever going to happen, so it remains only a hope.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Dec-16-2007 14:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
piku303
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2007
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by palm
this is like famous people would have to pay for wearing clothes' brands. maybe. just a thought. the dj is actualy doing free promotion for you so show some respect. the djs are VERY important to this scene. |
yeah the difference is is when you see those famous people wearing those clothes the magazines write who made the clothes. i would say dj's are important to the promotion of the genre, NOT the artist. every time i go to a show i dont know the name of my favourite song that night. then i go to TA and post in the unknown tracks section and find out what it is. how many people at clubs do that after? none. artists are not known. the least dj's could do is to flash the name of the artist and track when it starts up on the screen, if there is one. i think its hilarious that artists are the pawns in this whole thing and some dumbass who can work some cd decks is making all the cash.
|
|
Dec-16-2007 18:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
zodiac9
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
|
|
|
Don't forget about DJs who make their sets available via the internet, producers don't get any money out of that either. That is counted as promotion, so no one really cares I suppose. I bet a lot of DJs don't even get permission from the labels or producers.
I used to be in underground metal bands, so I'm used to not making money from music. At the moment, I'm trying to get some of my tracks signed to labels. I can tell this is going to take a while. When I do find a label or labels, it will take 3 or 4 months to see the release. After that long wait, I'll probably end up making under $100. It just doesn't seem worth it. If I was going to make $500 per track, that might be worth it.
I don't mind giving out tracks for free, but I'd have to do my own mastering and promotion, neither of which I am great at. I feel like that's all labels are good for.
|
|
Dec-18-2007 02:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ_RoKo
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: underneath_headphones
|
|
|
good thread guys, but i think everyones getting a little downer on producing music. you should never think music is not worth producing, if you think your making something that other ppl should be hearing keep going, like someone else said its all about the music. sure it might be hard to make a living out of but why should you stop trying, one reason why ure not making soo much money is because theres soo many other producers trying to break into the scene aswell so be original and work hard and eventually you might make it big. even if you dont you should be honoured that ppl out there do dig your music and aslong as you get some feedback from fans it should be worth it.
and dont forget dj's have to work freekin hard to make some cash too, theres soo many dickheads out there that think they can dj and youve got to be on top of em and trying to promote ureself and when everyones a dj is a bit hard. and djing isn't just knowing how to use cdjs, theres a shit load of reasearch and practise. i think that all dj's should be paying the proper price for the music they play as soon as they get a decent gig and i agree that producers are underpaid but unfortunately theres not much you can do but try harder to get ure music to the world, if ure real serious about trance music you should be a dj and producer i think,
think about this
your at a decent sized gig, good equipment in front of you, the last dj left the crowd happy but they're not peaking yet, standing in front of these ppl being the centre of attention already has the adrenalin pumping, some of the crowd know your name and music, your building in your set and the crowds vibe is risin and finally get to mixing in your track, smooth transition, bam! its mixed in and the crowd is loving it, you look around and theres those few ppl that just start partying even harder, you pause to enjoy the moment where you are in complete control of the crowd and have completely captured them with your music. your the first person to play ure track and local magazines give you a good write up, which promotes your track awesomely and other dj's buy ure track to try and recreate ure same effect but clubbers find that that was your own track and want to listen to the dj that made it and plays orginal tracks rather than hammering the tracks from armins last playlist.
lol, thats such a perfect situation but atleast its something to aspire to.
we all just got to remember why we love music and keep on tryin dont think about the money, think about the status, where you've got ureself with ure music, if you really love music youll have a high paying casual job just to pour cash into your music and if you work hard enough you will be rewarded.
goodluck
robb sonykc
|
|
Dec-18-2007 09:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:21.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|