|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
That becuase it's incredible difficult to do in real time without distotion or devation from the original sound, especially with zero latency.
Ryan075 is right, various methods are used, but you often loose the beat and/or tightness of the groove esoecially when it is a full sounding track (as per basilisk's psytrance). The harmonics just get so badly messed up.
It does work on minimal tracks, but the benefits to be had are less because there is not a lot going in the track. |
Hence using a custom-designed FFT circuit running at a few GHz a MAC block for each simultaneous MAC operation should do the trick, pipeline it all...
Hey presto 
If Ableton running on my laptop (1.6 GHz processor), which can probably only perform one MAC at a time can timestretch pretty reasonably with very little delay, then a dedicated 2 GHz FFT board capable of doing 256 of them at once should have no trouble at all... 2 GHz might be a bit ambitious what with propagation delays and all, so maybe 1 GHz or even 500 MHz would be more realistic - it'll still shit all over it.
___________________
Stu Cox | 

|