Originally posted by Chronosis
Your medium is what you want it to be. I make tracks for the people who listen to them at home with a decent stereo system. If it gets more play on clubs then nothing wrong with that, but that wasn't my main audience.
Making stuff in mono is what is sacrificing imo.
i never said your mix has to be mono. I was simply making a statement how panning things because you don't know how to eq is a bad practice.
Sep-29-2007 17:58
varun
Sunbaked
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Bangkok
Have been a live sound engineer for about 4 years but a producer for 2 months, all I can say is, the best way to EQ is indeed trial-and-error and listening to the sound in question, in context to the whole mix.
Of course, if there's sections of the track that have THAT sound playing by itself, you may need to EQ it seperately.
Most importantly, playing it by ear and listening to it on as many different sound systems as possible is more important than studying waveforms and graphs. In the end, it's about compromise as to what EQ config sounds good on MOST, all systems tested (if you're fortunate).
___________________
Spacy dreamer
Oct-02-2007 03:02
I<3acid
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: ny slum
Re: another EQ question
quote:
Originally posted by lowski
hey guys . i was wondering how much low frequency needs to be cut from a synth to make a mix sound good?.
none.
program your patches to sound good.
Oct-02-2007 03:27
System101
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Re: Re: another EQ question
quote:
Originally posted by I<3acid
none.
program your patches to sound good.
EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EQ'ed
Oct-02-2007 03:37
Chronosis
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Málaga
Re: Re: Re: another EQ question
quote:
Originally posted by System101
EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EQ'ed
Yeah, but it's indeed more important to use suitable patches in the first place.
Originally posted by System101
EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EQ'ed
um no
Oct-02-2007 20:47
Massive84
Old Relic
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Sequence Realm
Re: Re: Re: another EQ question
quote:
Originally posted by System101
EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EQ'ed
Lawl!
EQ is not only about room. It's about sound as well. A touch of EQ or EQ automation can give your synth a different sound than just the patch.
It depends where you cut the lows. but if you cut to much you lose power, same goes for the kick and such. Cut the highs to much there and lose clarity and piercing sounds.
The thing is, it's not EQing that makes your tune sound flawless but the mixing, Mainly the dynamics. Thats where panning kicks in as well.
Make sure your kick and bass have the loudest volumes on your mixer in general (depends on the style your producing or the intention you have on how the song should sound) Behind that but not by far are your themes and below that everything else. percussion, fx, bla bla.
Is this the magic formula? nope. but it's a way you learn the basics, from there it's really a cake . I don't even think anymore if i mix/eq/ or whatever, it just happens. And USUALLY it sounds more than decent
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Octanesyco
Greetings. My name is Casey. You can call me Moose.
-Moose
Oct-02-2007 21:09
I<3acid
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: ny slum
half the time you guys are talking about eq techniques that are practically the equivelant of running a highpassfilter over some shit.
synths have hpfs. use them.
im not saying eqs shouldnt be used, of course they should! however i think that people put too much focus on the processing of the sounds...
loads of great stuff is ran into a mixer with a shitty 3 band eq, and maybe only on a handful of channels! people are able to make great music in the most ghetto of ways, yet many times when you see people talking all numbers and visual analyzers...i don't see the results of really focusing in on such technicalities until later on.