Bah, who cares about the quality: music is what really matters Well, I've got two young brothers who are always destroying my beloved CD's, therefore, everytime I buy something, I encode it. Usually, I choose 160, but lately I've been enconding at 192 as well...
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
Jul-11-2002 04:27
Arbiter
Naked Power Organ
Registered: May 2002
Location:
320.. hell, just give me a .wav file
Jul-11-2002 05:22
Exhale
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Almost all stuff is in 192, but 256 is the rate I prefer. But .wav is even better .
Jul-14-2002 14:58
Spyder
Anti BS Alliance
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto CDN
192 plzzz... is somthing like .. but then again.. waht do i know..
ammm it's not too bad.. and not tooo good JUST right.. hehe
___________________
Addicted to UKTA MySpace
Good Girls go to Heaven, Naughty Girls go to London Originally posted by jennypie
Because you're a filthy WHORE!
Jul-22-2002 00:16
pnuemo
ALBATROSS
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
192 all the way baby! best quality/size ratio!
Jul-22-2002 06:31
fieroavian
Mentally Sick
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Netherworld
LAME VBR VBR VBR baby!!!!!!
192k VBR would be best for me, so 192k CBR comes close. btw, i'm so sick of people who encode MP3s in Xing encoder (which comes with AudioCatalyst), it's hands down the worst quality encoder out there, yet so popular.
Jul-22-2002 13:05
tsetso
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
that question is rhetorical, right? of course 192 kbps, what else...
___________________
just Never Look Back
Jul-25-2002 14:13
Parafox
re-addicted! ;-)
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Schwäbisch Hall
160 is almost enough - I don't hear big differences in the quality between a 192k and a 160k mp3...even 128 isn't bad!
___________________
Cause music is bigger than words
and wider than pictures. // Mogwai.
Jul-29-2002 00:00
cbxzcm
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Daly City, California
I like using "lame --r3mix"
Jul-29-2002 05:59
Nadi
Not quite an addict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles, Californa,
192 is the best for me as well. I dont have a great soundcard on my labtop, and when its not there im listening on headphones, so anything else wont sound any better. 160 is fine, but not as good and 128 or less is just shit
Well, I've got two young brothers who are always destroying my beloved CD's, therefore, everytime I buy something, I encode it. Usually, I choose 160, but lately I've been enconding at 192 as well...
.
UKTA
it's hands down the worst quality encoder out there, 
yet so popular.
