|
we can't put favre and warner in the same category. warner is a one hit wonder and a has been. we can put kurt wurner, jeff george, rich gannon, and steve beurelein in the same category. quarterbacks with semi long careers with a couple of seasons of "very big" seasons and the rest very mediocre. that wasn't the case for brett favre. favre had his bad moments here and there, but his numbers were consistent every year.
what really is pretty good about him was not like other great quarterbacks, he had to deal with throwing to different wide receivers every couple of years. quarterback-receiver chemistry is very critical, if you think about it, favre had throw it to receivers like andre rison, antonio freeman, robert brooks, and bill schroeder during his peak years. average to good wide receivers, but not the best receivers to depend on.
also favre had to deal with a mediocre running game during the mid to late 90s. reggie cobb, edgar bennett, and dorsey levens doesn't scare defenses. at least favre had ahmen "fumble the ball because my hands are small" green during the 2000s. montana had craig, aikman had emmitt smith, bradshaw had harris, and staubach had dorsett.
when we talk about favre, we have to put him with fran takerton and dan marino. quarterbacks who had to deal with a lot of mediocrity to win football games. although takerton and marino didn't win super bowls, they did perform at high levels to get their respective teams to the position of winning games.
just my 2 cents ......... 
___________________
|