|
| quote: | Originally posted by bas
It wasn't for fun, it was for art. Who are you to say his work wasn't art? People thought Leonardo's stuff was heresy :O |
I could be too stupid for art (a distinct possibility) but doesn't art come from having too much time on their hands for whatever reason? By that I mean, they no longer have to worry about hunting and gathering or building shelter (survival) every hour of every day? Therefore art is at the very least, a past-time? which is very close to "entertainment", which is very close to "fun"?
Therefore, because this guy doesn't have to worry about survival all the time for whatever reason, he entertains himself by starving dogs (fun), and puts it on display so he can get attention for himself (vanity), and then tries to disguise all this by saying he is "making a statement"?
I could be way off, but I've met a ton of these "shock" artist types and this is the general vibe I get from most of them.
To me, they are worse than these hicks that like to shoot and kill things, but hide behind "we are saving them from starvation" BS. I don't care that you like to shoot guns and kill things, just don't fucking lie about it.
___________________
<snfaulkner> have you ever shit in a drawer?
<frankie34> wtf?
<snfaulkner> face!
|