Originally posted by Mattsanity lol no man......your track is deep house. my goodness...
kevin yost is deep house and Im not gonna bother checking those other artists out since there is no techy deep house or deep techy house
it's really tricky to say that an artist is one genre. kevin yost has done a lot of things. he ranges from nujazz to deep house to tech house to dub
move d was an ambient and ambient techno artist with warp records for a long time, working with pete namlook/4voice. now he makes loopy deep house and deep tech house.
and thomas melchior is a prolific producer of techno, famously collaborating with peter ford for years
deep house pure and simple is like
franck roger - vera cruz
franck roger - bone of my bone
jay tripwire & matthew bandy - donuts
ben watt - lone cat (martinez & ferrer rerub)
mr v - jus dance (cosmic ritual dub)
liquid people - one life
Last edited by nefardec on Jul-17-2008 at 03:38
Jul-17-2008 03:29
elFreak
Blood Diamonds and Salsa
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: With Juan Pachanga Eating Tacos. Ah Ha Si Mi Gusta.
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
1)Hypnotic is not a genre. I've added it to describe the tune (doh). Deep/tech, they are used together because they describe the same spectrum of a sound, that of deep jazzy chords, moody pads, and at times tribal drumming. Deep house is the slower, more "full" loungey sound whereas "tech" house is a more upbeat, stripped-down dirtier version. The track you posted is a classic deep/tech house track. Sharam (which was known to play the deeper and techier sides of house) of deep dish, and Dubfire were associated with it (and remixed it). the current track when it is NOT categorised as "house", it is categorised as "deep house" in Discogs. The actual track is techy deep house, it is obvious and no one agreed on it being "Funky house" except for yourself.
2) Chris Liebing himself used the word "Schranz" to describe his sound in an interview which i clearly remember and i'm not lying about it. "Industrial Techno" is an imaginary genre. You can also see that in the series called "THE REAL SCHRANZ" by Chris Liebing
3) Check my samples on what "funky house" is and don't bother me with your stupid as fuck noobism anymore.
nice vids (minus morales lol)...they make me feel really old thanks.
you ruined it though by bothering to reply to eatadick guy.
ps eatadick guy, calling liebing anything other than schranz (at that time of course) is possibly the dumbest thing you have said among the hundreds of inane, absolutely mongloid posts you have wasted your time in making. good job.
damn i ruined it too.
quote:
Originally posted by stevėsto
ive never heard the term "funk house", ive only heard of "funky house". the stuff on strictly ryhthm and the one mattsanity posted for example. the one elfreak posted is just disco. you ask anyone on the street what elfreak posted and they will say disco.
considering the track i posted was produced during the post disco era i think you are full of shit. If you ask people on the street what house is , they will point at a building. The majority of the public have no clue what house music is, making you fit in for a change.
Originally posted by kadomony
spirit catcher mix totally owns jimpster mix :P
Those are two of my favorite producers at the moment actually. :P
___________________
Jul-17-2008 05:01
Mr Game+Watch
Luka Luka * Night Fever
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
mattsanity, listen to my mix 'timeless' for deep/tech house (not entirely though), also my sig mix has some in the middle
or my newest track:
trust me there is a such thing as techy deep house, and it has a name:
thomas melchior (check out melchior productions - coming up)
also move d (check out move d- AC1D)
listen to kevin yost - hypnotic progressions
then get back to me
There's definitely a difference between the more 'electronic' sounding deep house, such as Jimpster, Timewriter and your song (nice job, btw!), and the more "organic" sounds coming from the Naked Music roster, Kaskade, Ben Watt, The New Deal. But both genres have a lot of the same groundwork, i.e. a slow tempo and jazzy chords, rhodes, lushness. I would call the first "deep tech house" if we want to.
Jul-17-2008 14:01
stevėsto
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: St Petersburg, FL
quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
considering the track i posted was produced during the post disco era i think you are full of shit. If you ask people on the street what house is , they will point at a building. The majority of the public have no clue what house music is, making you fit in for a change.
tis house.
ah wait, i ruined it.
oh SHEEIT!! i didn't know they stopped making disco after the disco era. my bad. you're awesome at the internet.
Jul-17-2008 14:15
HaeD
Tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
quote:
Originally posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY
Thats not house mate. Funk yes, house, no.
Yea I know it sound way to gay to be a house track, not even remotely as kewl as a electro house, and there is no boom boom. So your probably right.
lol no man......your track is deep house. my goodness...
and Im not gonna bother checking those other artists out since there is no techy deep house or deep techy house 
