 |
|
|
|
 |
counterfeiter
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
Jul-19-2008 18:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
davidbuhau
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: bay area california
|
|
|
choose one you like, PURCHASE it, and stick with it.
learning every daw is fun, but i find that people who know how to use all of them don't really know how to use any of them... if you spend all your time learning the newest daw that everyone is talking about and making noise about, then you'll spend an awful lot less time working on your tunes.
this being said, making a switch because you see stuff you REALLY REALLY like about another software package can be helpful. i mean if we didn't do this, we'd all still be using mod trackers!
heh
david
___________________
http://www.hellaswell.com/buhau
love and puppies!
|
|
Jul-19-2008 22:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
echosystm
super wow maker

Registered: Jul 2004
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by -=chato4ever=-
Hahaha, so youre gonna tell me that Fruity Loops or live are better than Cubase? LOL. Maybe easier to use for newbies. So why do 90% of professional producers use either Cubase, Logic or Pro Tools? |
dude, hardly any edm producers use protools anymore. also, i'd go as far as saying that ableton is more popular than any other daw now. your argument is retarded anyway, just go sit in the corner.
anyway...
i was a long time user of FL - i started on it when i was 14 or so and it was just a beat sequencer (i'm 21 now). it does have a very good workflow for rhythm programming, because of the step sequencer.
however, i find FL really hard to recommend to people now - from a technical standpoint, FL has fallen very far behind the competition. it is missing many basic features that are expected of a daw - such as proper multicore CPU support, freezing, automatic plugin delay compensation, etc. it would seem the devs cannot or don't want to implement alot of these needed features, due to limitations in the way FL was originally written.
personally, i would just stick with ableton, cubase or sonar. reaper is probably the best daw, in terms of workflow, but it still has many problems. development seems to have slowed down alot too.
Last edited by echosystm on Jul-19-2008 at 23:56
|
|
Jul-19-2008 23:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:39.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|