|
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
Much like the upswing in weird and despicable news reports, it has a lot more to do with the communication medium and increased media penetration. But there is another side to this: we view the past through a filtered lens. The artists we remember are almost always the good ones; those who made music to last. All the copycats and hacks from back in the day are overlooked... so it just seems like the average quality of a release was better back then. I don't really think that is necessarily the case. |
Well, there is some of that "nostalgia" effect, but I don't think that's the whole story.
The truth is that when it was a lot more difficult and expensive to make electronic music and get it pressed, only people who were either very dedicated or rich could do it.
Don't get me wrong, there's still lots of good music to be found today. It's just that there are also piles of mediocre shit that either simply wouldn't have been released pre-2000s or wouldn't even have been made at all because the crappy and undedicated producers who gave birth to it would have been too discouraged by the difficulty and time investment required to make signable music.
|