Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont. > Math Question...
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
ChemEnhanced
ƒ¶ƒåƒÓƒÛƒnƒéƒßƒåƒnƒÚƒÕƒÞƒ



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Milton, ON Canada

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
That really depends whether or not Billy is running an industrial assembly line. I mean, it's pretty unlikely that he has the equipment sitting around in his basement to melt and fuse copper with perfect efficiency and without introducing any impurities. So I'd have to assume he's working at a plant somewhere.

Assuming that, we still need to know if it's a clean room, like a fab, or a regular factory where the copper slabs have no doubt picked up all sorts of dirt, and the melting process probably leaves a copper residue behind.

Now, since the question explicitly states "the resulting piece", it also clearly suggests a freezing process. Does it go into a freezer, sealed, or is it just left sitting around until it solidifies? If memory serves, copper doesn't sublimate, but the impurities might at the right atmospheric temperature, which means that the resulting solid might actually be slightly more pure than the original liquid.

Finally, how is the determination of purity being made? It's easy enough to weigh the thing, but in order to determine the purity you usually have to melt it down or distill it, which seems to be a pointless exercise here after making the new alloy. And if Billy had to melt down the original two samples just to find out the purity, how can we be sure that he didn't lose some copper in that process, before he even started combining them? Are we assuming a specific loss rate here or are these ideal, perfect (i.e. imaginary) conditions?

More to the point, if Billy already has a scale, which he would have needed to weigh the final sample, why didn't he just weigh the original two samples in the first place instead of going through all this ridiculous hassle?


I could just imagine some kid at school writing that down on a test because he didn't know the answer.


___________________
quote:
Scott has been introduced to the rave scene, and Ecstasy, by Craig. The two of them go out on the weekends, with some of Craigs friends, and stay up all night, dancing in a drug-fueled trance.


Last edited by Moral Hazard on Apr-26-2011 at 07:48

Old Post Sep-29-2008 22:21  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for ChemEnhanced Click here to Send ChemEnhanced a Private Message Add ChemEnhanced to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
VDub
Scoundrel



Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
That really depends whether or not Billy is running an industrial assembly line. I mean, it's pretty unlikely that he has the equipment sitting around in his basement to melt and fuse copper with perfect efficiency and without introducing any impurities. So I'd have to assume he's working at a plant somewhere.

Assuming that, we still need to know if it's a clean room, like a fab, or a regular factory where the copper slabs have no doubt picked up all sorts of dirt, and the melting process probably leaves a copper residue behind.

Now, since the question explicitly states "the resulting piece", it also clearly suggests a freezing process. Does it go into a freezer, sealed, or is it just left sitting around until it solidifies? If memory serves, copper doesn't sublimate, but the impurities might at the right atmospheric temperature, which means that the resulting solid might actually be slightly more pure than the original liquid.

Finally, how is the determination of purity being made? It's easy enough to weigh the thing, but in order to determine the purity you usually have to melt it down or distill it, which seems to be a pointless exercise here after making the new alloy. And if Billy had to melt down the original two samples just to find out the purity, how can we be sure that he didn't lose some copper in that process, before he even started combining them? Are we assuming a specific loss rate here or are these ideal, perfect (i.e. imaginary) conditions?

More to the point, if Billy already has a scale, which he would have needed to weigh the final sample, why didn't he just weigh the original two samples in the first place instead of going through all this ridiculous hassle?



LOL...


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
chinamon is INCH MOAN.
LOL so fitting.

Last edited by VDub on Sep-29-2008 at 22:32

Old Post Sep-29-2008 22:22 
Click Here to See the Profile for VDub Click here to Send VDub a Private Message Add VDub to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
VDub
Scoundrel



Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto

My math...

I worked the percentages...

Copper...

60% of 51% is 30.6% of 400g is 122.4g...

40% of 51% is 20.4% of 400g is 81.6g...

And the alloy...

40% of 49% is 19.6% of 400g is 78.4g...

60% of 49% is 29.4% of 400g is 117.6g...

Add the totals...

122.4 + 78.4 = 200.8

81.6 + 117.6 = 199.2


200.8g + 199.2g = 400g


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
chinamon is INCH MOAN.
LOL so fitting.

Old Post Sep-29-2008 22:30 
Click Here to See the Profile for VDub Click here to Send VDub a Private Message Add VDub to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Search&Rescue
low motion disco



Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto / Dubai

x = mass of alloy w/ 60% copper
y = mass of allow w/ 40% copper

Total mass of copper = 51% of 400g = 204g
Mass of copper in x = 60% of x = 0.60x
Mass of copper in y = 40% of y = 0.40y

Assuming, no constituent of the alloy is lost,
x + y = 400g
and
0.60x + 0.40y = 204

Solving for x and y gives:

x = 220g
y = 180g

Old Post Sep-29-2008 22:42  United Arab Emirates
Click Here to See the Profile for Search&Rescue Click here to Send Search&Rescue a Private Message Add Search&Rescue to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
VDub
Scoundrel



Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto

quote:
Originally posted by Search&Rescue
x = mass of alloy w/ 60% copper
y = mass of allow w/ 40% copper

Total mass of copper = 51% of 400g = 204g
Mass of copper in x = 60% of x = 0.60x
Mass of copper in y = 40% of y = 0.40y

Assuming, no constituent of the alloy is lost,
x + y = 400g
and
0.60x + 0.40y = 204

Solving for x and y gives:

x = 220g
y = 180g


Yes that answer does seem a lot easier to swallow...

But where my math is faulted is what I want to know....


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
chinamon is INCH MOAN.
LOL so fitting.

Old Post Sep-29-2008 22:46 
Click Here to See the Profile for VDub Click here to Send VDub a Private Message Add VDub to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
I could just imagine some kid at school writing that down on a test because he didn't know the answer.

In all seriousness, it's a better answer than the obvious one. I'd give bonus marks for it. In the real world, you don't work under ideal conditions; more importantly, I wish more people could look at a complicated, long-winded process and say "Hey, there's a WAY simpler solution here."

This is why I always hated school. Contrived problems, oversimplified solutions. (And I was an engineer)


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Sep-29-2008 22:54  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Search&Rescue
low motion disco



Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto / Dubai

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
now look in the back of the math book and get the answer

Copper = 204 Alloy = 196

60%copper (122.4) + 40%alloy (78.4) = 200.8

40%copper (81.6) + 60%alloy(117.6) = 199.2


in every number you have in parentheses, you have assumed the original mass of the alloy to be either 100% copper (when you're calculating the mass of the copper in each) or 0% copper (when you're calculating the mass of contituents other than copper in each)

Old Post Sep-29-2008 23:04  United Arab Emirates
Click Here to See the Profile for Search&Rescue Click here to Send Search&Rescue a Private Message Add Search&Rescue to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ChemEnhanced
ƒ¶ƒåƒÓƒÛƒnƒéƒßƒåƒnƒÚƒÕƒÞƒ



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Milton, ON Canada

quote:
Originally posted by Search&Rescue
x = mass of alloy w/ 60% copper
y = mass of allow w/ 40% copper

Total mass of copper = 51% of 400g = 204g
Mass of copper in x = 60% of x = 0.60x
Mass of copper in y = 40% of y = 0.40y

Assuming, no constituent of the alloy is lost,
x + y = 400g
and
0.60x + 0.40y = 204

Solving for x and y gives:

x = 220g
y = 180g


your formula looks good to me....can you break down the calculations to get x and y.....its been way too long since I've had to do this type of math....and I actually use to be good at it


___________________
quote:
Scott has been introduced to the rave scene, and Ecstasy, by Craig. The two of them go out on the weekends, with some of Craigs friends, and stay up all night, dancing in a drug-fueled trance.


Last edited by Moral Hazard on Apr-26-2011 at 07:48

Old Post Sep-29-2008 23:07  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for ChemEnhanced Click here to Send ChemEnhanced a Private Message Add ChemEnhanced to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Search&Rescue
low motion disco



Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto / Dubai

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
can you break down the calculations to get x and y.....

are you being serious? Because I can't tell

Old Post Sep-29-2008 23:14  United Arab Emirates
Click Here to See the Profile for Search&Rescue Click here to Send Search&Rescue a Private Message Add Search&Rescue to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ChemEnhanced
ƒ¶ƒåƒÓƒÛƒnƒéƒßƒåƒnƒÚƒÕƒÞƒ



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Milton, ON Canada

quote:
Originally posted by Search&Rescue
are you being serious? Because I can't tell


I am being serious....I haven't done problem solving like this probably 15 years

I am trying to work through it...but keep getting stuck.


___________________
quote:
Scott has been introduced to the rave scene, and Ecstasy, by Craig. The two of them go out on the weekends, with some of Craigs friends, and stay up all night, dancing in a drug-fueled trance.


Last edited by Moral Hazard on Apr-26-2011 at 07:48

Old Post Sep-29-2008 23:22  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for ChemEnhanced Click here to Send ChemEnhanced a Private Message Add ChemEnhanced to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Search&Rescue
low motion disco



Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto / Dubai

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
I am being serious....I haven't done problem solving like this probably 15 years

I am trying to work through it...but keep getting stuck.

well, in that case:
you re-arrange any one unknown and express the other in terms of this
e.g. x + y = 400
so x = 400 - y

then you got your second equation in terms of x and y
substitute x = 400 - y into your second equation, re-arrange the terms and solve for y. Then solve for x which is just = 400 - y

Old Post Sep-29-2008 23:27  United Arab Emirates
Click Here to See the Profile for Search&Rescue Click here to Send Search&Rescue a Private Message Add Search&Rescue to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Search&Rescue
low motion disco



Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto / Dubai

..and that's just one way of solving linear equations

Old Post Sep-29-2008 23:29  United Arab Emirates
Click Here to See the Profile for Search&Rescue Click here to Send Search&Rescue a Private Message Add Search&Rescue to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont. > Math Question...
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playback1993 Trance track - played by Laurent Garnier (sample included) [2006] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackMauro M.B.S. Presents Seven Saturdays - Dirty Vinyl Pusher (Dirty Dub Mix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!