|
| quote: | Originally posted by Groundhog Boy
60 in the Senate isn't happening. McConnell losing had to happen and it didn't |
They needed McConnell or Chambliss' seats and the latter isn't over. If it goes into a runoff expect a big show from big players to help Martin.
| quote: | Martin says he’s in a runoff — Chambliss says, ‘Not yet’
Wednesday, November 5, 2008, 09:46 AM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
During the pre-dawn hours, Republican incumbent Saxby Chambliss slipped below the 50 percent mark, and the U.S. Senate race now appears headed toward a runoff with Democrat Jim Martin.
The Chambliss campaign said this morning that it’s not conceding anything, and will wait for a smattering of precincts, absentees and paper ballots to be counted.
The Democratic campaign says that it’s now in runoff mode. Martin has an 11:45 a.m. press conference scheduled.
http://www.ajc.com/services/content..._runoff_ch.html |
It probably won't reach 60 but if Al Franken pulls ahead in Minnesota they could get damned close.
What the fuck is wrong with Alaska? They're getting close to electing a convicted man to the Senate.
| quote: |
Ted Stevens Sins, And (Likely) Wins
By Nathan Thornburgh Wednesday, Nov. 05, 2008
While change sweeps the nation, Alaska is voting for more of the same. With results from 99% of the state's precincts in, Senator Ted Stevens — who on Oct. 27 was convicted in federal court on seven counts of corruption — held a slim 4,000 vote lead over his opponent, Anchorage mayor Mark Begich. With about 50,000 uncounted absentee and early ballots, a definitive winner could be days or weeks away.
This, of course, seems a scandalous result. Stevens, the country's longest-serving Senator, was found guilty of concealing improper gifts he received from an oil services company executive. Although he claims he is innocent and is fighting to overturn the court decision, Stevens' Senate colleagues, particularly from his own party, have made it clear that the 84-year-old will not be allowed to rejoin the Senate if his conviction is upheld. Although it's never happened before, the senate could move to expel a senator by two-thirds vote.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/a...1856672,00.html |
|