|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Unfortunately you have completely the wrong idea about missile defence. The bases in Poland, Czech Rep and the UK (which I get to visit next month!!) are to defend against a missile launched from Iran (well, the Middle East region) and would be completely useless at defending against Russian missiles, not only for their location but because Russia has thousands of warheads (and many more thousands in reserve) which this missile shield simply cannot defend against.
Missiles fired from Russia would fly over Sarah Palin's house, or would be launched right on the coast line from nuclear subs. They would NOT fly over Poland!
But I don't think the missile shield is a defensive system, but an offensive system to increase American dominance over the Middle East (and all its resources), and THIS is what Russia feels threatened by. |
That's very interesting, never thought of that. It's so odd, that what's presented by the media, or even what is considered "common sense", e.g., "Well of course the missile deployment in Poland is actually meant to defend against Russians due to the close proximity" -- could be way off the mark, and that the real reason is much more subtle!
What's also interesting is that politicians choose to talk and rebut along these false lines! As you say, Russia knows what the missiles are for (Mid-east dominance), and feels threatened by them, and the Americans know what they are for (since they put them there...), and yet, on the world stage, they play this game of "is Russia being targeted or not". Weird!
I wonder why that is...? Is it because these false arguments are more emotionally-charged and strike more of a raw nerve with the populace than the "real" reason? I.e., if Russia complained vis-a-vis the Middle East, maybe the Russian (& European/World) people wouldn't care so much. But they have a greater chance of stopping it if they appeal along the lines of, "We're being targeted by the imperialistic Americans!!1"

|