quote:

Originally posted by culorut Of course the building is still standing. Fires alone do not and have never brought a building down in all of history.

O rly?



Naw, never.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Fires alone do not and have never brought a building down in all of history.

for you.

quote:

Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov O rly? Naw, never.

When facts don't matter, anything can happen!

___________________

That building is still standing and burned much longer then WTC7 did by the looks of it. Show me one that collapsed like WTC7 already, it's only been like a few years I have been asking....

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton No shit. A building hit that building.

LOL, of course it hit the only other building that was under the same insurance policy. The other buildings much closer then WTC7 where miraculously sparred.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut LOL, of course it hit the only other building that was under the same insurance policy. The other buildings much closer then WTC7 where miraculously sparred.

I know the facts don't matter to you, but the buildings "much closer" than WTC 7 were not spared. WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6 were completely destroyed. Here let me throw this smiley in (you deserve it)...



Here, start reading...page 34...come back when you'v learned something...

http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf

___________________

Thanks for proving my point yet again. Bother to notice all the buildings which were destroyed all have something in common?

Insurance policy.


The Verizon building actually took two hits (WTC7 and North Tower) but did not collapse a la controlled demolition style did it? In fact no other building which all suffered more "impact debris" did not crumble down on 9/11 like any of the WTC's.

Yeah I am know, I am ignoring the facts.

Smiley for you,

quote:

Originally posted by culorut That building is still standing and burned much longer then WTC7 did by the looks of it. Show me one that collapsed like WTC7 already, it's only been like a few years I have been asking....

Yeah I am still waiting....

quote:

Here, start reading...page 34...come back when you'v learned something... http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCST...lic_comment.pdf

Yes I need a another bullshit report (9/11 omission report) that took 7 fuckin years to tell us when a simple video makes it very obvious what really transpired all along.

Since you like the NIST report so much here you go, read and learn.

NIST's Explanation of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/nistreport.html

NIST Conceals the Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/

NIST WTC 7 Report: Shameful, Embarrassing And Completely Flawed

http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-wt...ely-flawed.html

NIST WTC 7 "Fire" Conclusion Blatantly Contradicts FEMA Report

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/nist...cts-fema-report

Ok one more just to seal the deal.


NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Thanks for proving my point yet again. Bother to notice all the buildings which were destroyed all have something in common? Insurance policy. The Verizon building actually took two hits (WTC7 and North Tower) but did not collapse a la controlled demolition style did it? In fact no other building which all suffered more "impact debris" did not crumble down on 9/11 like any of the WTC's. Yeah I am know, I am ignoring the facts. Smiley for you,

lol, so if a building had an insurance policy, they collapsed? LOL. Maybe if I have a life insurance policy, I should just die so my family collects on it..

And just because the Verizon building did not collapse does not equate to the WTC7 building shouldn't have either. False logic there. Plenty of building did collapse. The fact that some didn't does not equate as evidence that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, which you and your ilk still have yet to prove. So keep on trying, or just give up.

___________________