Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > 32bit vs. 16bit
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
RichieV
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location:
Re: 32bit vs. 16bit

quote:
Originally posted by StephenWiley
Am I the only one who is noticing a very palpable difference in the two in terms of quality? The 32bit sounds so much smoother and seems like it brings out frequencies better. I was mastering a tune the other day, and I did a 16bit vs. the original 32bit and the 32bit blew it away. Why in the world isn't 32bit a standard yet?!


bit affects dynamic range. Since EDM has no dynamic range, the difference between 16 and 32 is entirely in your head. Sampling rate will have a much greater effect on actual percieved frequencies. EDM will not benifit from an increase bit representation.

Last edited by RichieV on Apr-06-2009 at 02:26

Old Post Apr-06-2009 02:03  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for RichieV Click here to Send RichieV a Private Message Add RichieV to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
Absolutely, but to clarify this further, even if your system runs at 32 bit, you will not be able to use really any benefit off that as your system is only as good as the weakest link in the chain.

In nearly everyone's case this is the soundcard, which as diginut rightly points out is 24bit.

So basically, to maintain the highest quality while producing your host needs to be at 24bit and so does your all your equipment. Any higher than that is quite pointless as you can't take advantage of it at any stage of the production process. Therfore going lower than that is not maximising your available quality.

Ehhh, I understand what you're trying to say but you're using an oversimplified model and therefore coming to the wrong conclusion.

There's no advantage to trying to push above 24 bits at either the input or output stage, but there is a very good reason for using higher precision in intermediate stages, specifically, intermediate processing and effects.

Think about it. Every line item on your credit card has exactly 2 decimal places (cents). But if they rounded everything to 2 sig figs, if they calculated your interest this way for example, then your interest would be zero, the system wouldn't work. Everything that comes into the system has 2 decimal digits, and everything that goes out of the system has 2 decimal digits, but that doesn't mean it makes sense to limit everything inside the system to 2 decimal digits.

Multiply 1.2 by 1.3 and you get 1.56. Look, we needed an extra digit of precision to store the result. Multiply again by 1.1 and you get 1.716, which rounds to just 1.7. But if you round the intermediate result, you have 1.6 * 1.1 = 1.76, which rounds to 1.8. By limiting your internal precision to the "weakest link", you've just created a clear error.

If you're just going to record a bunch of tracks, mix them together, and toss them back out without actually doing anything to them, then sure, the sequencer itself could just as well use 24 bits internally. But that's almost never what happens; every EQ, every reverb, every compressor would degrade the signal just a little bit at fixed-point precision, and after 50 of these you'd start to get real audible artifacts. Using 32-bit float for all internal computations, you get almost none of that. You lose a little bit of quality at the very end, converting back to 24-bit fixed point, but with a decent dither it's impossible to hear.

Your host does not need to be at 24-bit for the best quality, and in fact it isn't at 24-bit, it's at 32-bit. It is not pointless, and you couldn't change it even if it was!


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Apr-06-2009 02:37  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > 32bit vs. 16bit
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHardcore techno id? [2004] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackWarp Brothers - "Phatt Bass" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:12.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!