Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Human Evolution? or Human Regression?
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
what is the need for mental advancement.

How often do you do calculus for fun?
How often do you try to derive new equations?
How often do you try to understand time dialation and set up experiements to prove it. Or ponder about quarks?
How often do you sit at home after work and watch tv?



If less then 1% of our population never to everything by the last question then i can see signs of mental degredation.

If you don't use it.. you lose it. Whats the point of developing neural connections when you just need the basic ones to watch sex in the city, heroes or family guy.


yet i would argue that there are still more people engaged in such matters now than there ever were in the past.


___________________

Old Post Oct-16-2009 00:33  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nrg2Nfinit
ItaloDiscoAddict



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Ottawa

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
If beavers build dams to help themselves survive, doesn't that mean they are regressing as a species? Why can't they just stay out in the water and on the bare shore the whole time?



The scale is not even the same. You cant compare beavers building a dam to construction workers building an apaprtment and freeloaders just sitting on their ass collecting wellfare and living in them.

At least each beaver knows how to build a dam and the trait is easily relearned throughout generations. Imagine if we had to reinvent the wheel? lol


quote:

Why do you think that will happen?


It is ineveitable that at some point in time some catastrophe would or will strike. Be it thousands or hundreds of years from now. If not. God bless i guess


quote:

Small mammals like mice and rats with their tiny core and high surface area to volume ratio die much more easily in the cold, even compared to a naked human.


what are you talking about? Rats like most other mammals grow fur and can shed in the summer. I am talking about hypothermia even in tropical climates where temperatures drop significantly during nightfall. We simply have very little immunity to nature when it comes to our morphological presence. No hair nothing. We have been conditioned to our sheltered lifestyle that if taken away would devastate our species completely.

Anyways i am playing devils advocate alot here and obviously i have faith in our species for the next couple of hundred or several thousand years to come but one cannot argue that in terms of the environment and physically / genetically we as a species have become weaker and more dependent on our devices to survive.

Old Post Oct-16-2009 01:46 
Click Here to See the Profile for Nrg2Nfinit Click here to Send Nrg2Nfinit a Private Message Add Nrg2Nfinit to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
It is ineveitable that at some point in time some catastrophe would or will strike.

It does, year in and year out. Earthquakes that kill tens of thousands, tsunamis and droughts that kill hundreds of thousands, disease epidemics that kill millions or tens of millions. But we survive because we have become so numerous and spread ourselves so far around the globe into so many climates and biomes that these disasters will not affect the long run survival of the species. What do you think will be so catastrophic that it will wipe out every human in every climate and location around the globe?

Old Post Oct-16-2009 01:55  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sunsnail
Global Moderator



Registered: Sep 2004
Location:

socialized medicine

Old Post Oct-16-2009 01:57 
Click Here to See the Profile for Sunsnail Click here to Send Sunsnail a Private Message Add Sunsnail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
socialized medicine

Old Post Oct-16-2009 02:02  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester

I actually predict that the unsustainable human population growth will eventually result in the ecosystem forcefully rebalancing itself, with either a mass famine or some sort of plague drastically culling the Earth's population. The affluent will survive and eventually humanity will have been reduced to a more managable size with a generally higher standard of living. Our impact on the climate and the environment will be much smaller, and after an incredible tragedy of human suffering, things might actually be much better.


___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

Old Post Oct-16-2009 02:07  England
Click Here to See the Profile for SYSTEM-J Click here to Send SYSTEM-J a Private Message Visit SYSTEM-J's homepage! Add SYSTEM-J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nrg2Nfinit
ItaloDiscoAddict



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Ottawa

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yet i would argue that there are still more people engaged in such matters now than there ever were in the past.



The matters now are so much smaller in amplitude then the discoveries before that lead to them.

Old Post Oct-16-2009 02:09 
Click Here to See the Profile for Nrg2Nfinit Click here to Send Nrg2Nfinit a Private Message Add Nrg2Nfinit to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
The matters now are so much smaller in amplitude then the discoveries before that lead to them.


well of course, there's (relatively) less to know now!

but seriously, we now have thousands of people that dedicate their lives/professions to various scientific endeavours; how can you even compare that to previous times when most average people were simply struggling to subsist?


___________________

Old Post Oct-16-2009 02:14  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Arbiter
Naked Power Organ



Registered: May 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Anyway, the article has less to do with genetic evolution and more to do with environment.


Yep, there has not been remotely enough generations since the industrial revolution to see significant genetic effects.

In the long run, the most adverse genetic effects would likely be the result of medical advances that allow people with deleterious genetic conditions to live a normal life and reproduce when they would otherwise perish.

Old Post Oct-16-2009 02:57 
Click Here to See the Profile for Arbiter Click here to Send Arbiter a Private Message Add Arbiter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nrg2Nfinit
ItaloDiscoAddict



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Ottawa

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
well of course, there's (relatively) less to know now!

but seriously, we now have thousands of people that dedicate their lives/professions to various scientific endeavours; how can you even compare that to previous times when most average people were simply struggling to subsist?



I agree with you completely. More people are studying, technology is being amplified (nothing really new is being developed, things are just more efficient and precice.

The truth of the matter is the more we depend on our devices, the weaker and more suceptible we become to nature without them.

Old Post Oct-16-2009 02:59 
Click Here to See the Profile for Nrg2Nfinit Click here to Send Nrg2Nfinit a Private Message Add Nrg2Nfinit to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nrg2Nfinit
ItaloDiscoAddict



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Ottawa

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
Yep, there has not been remotely enough generations since the industrial revolution to see significant genetic effects.

In the long run, the most adverse genetic effects would likely be the result of medical advances that allow people with deleterious genetic conditions to live a normal life and reproduce when they would otherwise perish.


basically what your saying here is that the gene pool will continue to flourish with genetic defects and we have to resolve them with our medical advances. The only true way to weed these defects out is through eugenics.

Natural selection is thus bypassed, and defects are not naturally weeded out.

Old Post Oct-16-2009 03:03 
Click Here to See the Profile for Nrg2Nfinit Click here to Send Nrg2Nfinit a Private Message Add Nrg2Nfinit to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

Going back to another point, humans are not too great at surviving cold but we *can* survive heat much better than many mammals (one of my reasons for posting that persistence hunt video where the guy runs the animal to death in the middle of the day) -- bipedal = less surface area exposed directly to sun + sweat glands and bare skin for releasing heat from the body. That is what we are built for anyway as we evolved on the savanna.

Old Post Oct-16-2009 03:03  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Human Evolution? or Human Regression?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackJan Van Biesen - I Love Techno 2003 DVD [2004] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPaul van Dyk - "Today" (Trance Ambient Mix) [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:34.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!