|
| quote: | Originally posted by CortexBomb
Unfortunately, I think the gist of the idea would be that the RIAA wouldn't care where you initially got the files, only that you were sharing them.
I agree that proving if you own the music on your HD or not is almost impossible without a search warrant and other extreme measures... (which'd be much more trouble then they'd be worth...) the problem is that the recording industry is balls out crazy about stamping out piracy while failing to realize that it's here to stay.
The digital revolution and the ability of people to swap music is not going to be even minorly slowed by any of this...even without P2P (which simply isn't going to be killed, ever IMHO) people could still swap hand burned CD's amongst each other and what the hell is the government going to try and do about that?
To my mind the problem isn't piracy, it's the ridiculous price of music...if CD's cost $5 a piece like they should you wouldn't have people d/ling everything. I know I still buy the actual vinyl or CD's when they're reasonably costed and released domestically (since importing stuff costs waaay too much dinero) but I don't blame people who refuse to give the majors penny numero uno.
The industry needs to wake the fuck up and realize that it's created it's own problems and that the only answer is reducing costs...if they did I wouldn't be surprised to see sales (in dollars) to not only stay put, but increase significantly... |
You hit it perfectly! It's the PRICES of CDs that make people DL music! I walk into a Tower Records and see CDs priced at USD $15.99+. Isn't that rediculous (sp?)? Imports are even more higher! In fact, they're 2.5 TIMES higher! I see those for about $30 - $40! I understand import costs but, who's going to pay $40 for a CD that's only 45 minutes long and there's only ONE TO THREE songs on it that are actually good! I don't care about the RIAA suing me because they never will know who I am!!!
|