 |
|
|
|
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
I've never owned one but theres a reason for that.
I don't like that teh hardware isn't very efficient, that the number of instances of things you can run are quite limited. That the interface it uses to connect to your computer can become obsolete VERY quickly and that it doesn't offload the most important processing are two other big issues.
The most CPU intensive processing you do in a DAW is your synths and strange effect chains. Not your EQ or compresion. If you look at how much CPU power those take up, its minimal. Reverb takes a bit, but not enough to justify a whole card for it IMO.
The only DSP solution I'd consider wouold be a kyma or an eventide. Having looked at your gear list, I'd say you'd be far better off looking into a new audio interface if your doing any recording, or if not, then refining what you really want from a DSP solution and getting a specialised unit.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Dec-23-2009 12:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
|
Dec-23-2009 13:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
hexadecimal
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
|
Nobody does DSP "clones" like UAD. They are the best, hands down.
They work closely with the developers of the product they're creating a DSP approximation of, and only release them when the designers of the actual product are happy with it. This rarely happens when VST/AU clones are being created, and it shows.
I've owned most of the hardware that I currently have UAD plugins of, and I'd be lying if I said I could tell the difference.
The Fatso is a lot more than a mastering tool. It's great for mastering, but equally good when used as an effect on individual tracks, etc. It's one of the best tape saturation devices out there, and the UAD version (which includes the Fatso Sr., a device the designer never got to release in hardware) is dead accurate.
|
|
Dec-23-2009 16:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Storyteller
I mostly disagree with what you're saying about the UAD itself.
The new UAD cards are PCI-e so will be around for quite some time. The only real external card was the UAD Xpander I think.
|
Thats what everyone thought a few years ago when they bought the PCI version.
| quote: | Originally posted by Storyteller
Furthermore the new version has 2.5x the processing power of it's predecessor and a fair ammount of the plugins are of a quality you rarely come across in ordinary VST plugins.
http://www.uaudio.com/support/uad/charts.html
In the above chart you can see most plugins can be used a decent amount of times within one project, apart from a few. |
Frankly, I haven't heard the plugins ABed against the real thing. So I can't really say. But I can't see how they would be THAT much better than something by Waves, like the SSL pack or Sonnox, or even sonalksis's stuff.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Dec-24-2009 15:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by tehlord
You've never used T-Racks then, or Elephant, or Vintage Warmer, or Ozone.
That comment is incorrect. |
Actually, I've used both T-Racks and ozone. I didn't find them to be to my taste generally.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Dec-24-2009 15:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:18.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|