quote:

Originally posted by ******** but what if your freind is already a scientologist and has made the bet up as a cover to make you reluctant to leave the cult before you are brainwashed? not that a scientologist would do that.

I've known this guy for 10 years, I'm pretty sure he's not a scientologist already. But good thinking all the same.

His name is Robert Paulsen
His name is Robert Paulsen
His name is Robert Paulsen
His name is Robert Paulsen
His name is Robert Paulsen
His name is Robert Paulsen
His name is Robert Paulsen

wat

___________________
Nothing to see here

quote:

Originally posted by Tangil Yeah I'm a bit worried that I'll be in their "net" so that they'll always be somehow keeping an eye on me or something.

Or they'll kill you or sue you when you try to leave.

Good luck!

Oh, I wouldn't do it, btw.

___________________
Quarantine Classics Brunello di Montalcino (In Transit) Edition [Progressive Classics] (August 2020)
Quarantine Classics - Puligny-Montrachet Edition [Progressive Classics] (April 2020)
What Is Progressive Anyways? [Progressive House Classics] (November 2019)

Does anyone think CERN LHC has a really good chance of being worshiped as a cult

It 8 billion dollars + pumped into it already most cults get no where near that much funding

+ it is supposedly the coldest place in the universe (pretty signifigant to be the most something in the universe)

+ it can crush matter and release more energy than the atom bomb

- it isn't up to full speed until about 6 days (The time it took god to make the universe) after doomsday - irony here??? in 2013. doomsday is the 24th september - chirstmas eve of 2012 - how many people who work with the LHC will be on vacation then.. an ideal time for maybe a special gift from "other more advanced" civilizations or omnipotent god.


Nuclear bombs release MeV 89% efficiency-- LHC releases TeV 100% efficiency---

the most destructive force ever.. and this isn't even taking into consideration antimatter. CERN makes ANTIMATTER--- and antimatter bombs are more destructive than NUCLEAR BOMBS!!!

http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-A...HC-104535.shtml

see this article that says they don't.


See this article stating CERN DID IT IN the 1990's.

http://www.wisegeek.com/how-is-antimatter-made.htm

Last edited by w_ashley on Apr-05-2010 at 04:32

Fuck off.

quote:

Originally posted by ******** Does anyone think CERN LHC has a really good chance of being worshiped as a cult It 8 billion dollars + pumped into it already most cults get no where near that much funding + it is supposedly the coldest place in the universe (pretty signifigant to be the most something in the universe) + it can crush matter and release more energy than the atom bomb - it isn't up to full speed until about 6 days (The time it took god to make the universe) after doomsday - irony here??? in 2013. doomsday is the 24th september - chirstmas eve of 2012 - how many people who work with the LHC will be on vacation then.. an ideal time for maybe a special gift from "other more advanced" civilizations or omnipotent god. Nuclear bombs release MeV 89% efficiency-- LHC releases TeV 100% efficiency---

Do you have a mental disorder?

quote:

Originally posted by djnitride Do you have a mental disorder?

No.


Under the blanket of the term 1 in 3 people on the planet have a mental disorder.

There is clear bullshit and clear people who are not able to communicate coherently. I can communicate coherently, and my beliefs and practices do not represent a lack of order, but instead a general acceptance and capacity.

The mental health system is largely representative of totalitarian policies and hate culture who attack individuals who do not conform to authorities.

If you say living life the way you want is a mental disorder you are false. It is the idea that the individual is not aware of the harm that may be caused by their actions, not that they don't care about the harm.

Reckless endangerment is not valuing the established world high enough over ones desire to do something.

While I am not someone who recklessly disregards themself, I can recognize both situations. Personally I see the person who is willing to live, rather than limit thier life as the freer person, and thus more justified to support.

You can say life is defined, and reality is this way, but reality is only what is experienced. It is totalitarian to force your way of life on another person or another culture. No culture is more right than another, and there is no absolute proof that any given world view is the right one. Individuals should have freedom in choice to live their life, so long as it does not endanger the general public. Citizens should not be slaves to the state. Citizens should be free in making their own choices. While endangering or harming another is issued and people have the right to defence against what is seen as a personal threat to themselves, rationaly and reasonably. The individual should be free in making their own choices. No man needs a keeper.

I support a free society, I am not mentally disordered. If mental illness is reduced to those who believe in freedom I would rather live in a mad world than a prison.

I'm idealistically non ethnocentric not mentally disordered - and sure I have elements of culture but it doesn't mean I need to shakle my mind to those thoughts or abandon the primal sense the inner beast, that is where the heart of humanity exists, not in the shakles of ordination but in communication with the soul.

Just to reiterate this does not mean I openly endanger others, as I am conscious of their views and the "real" dangers or "unfounded" supersticions. While I tend to draw the line at what will limit my well being by adherance in what I beleive, vs what can be respected by what they beleive. That is the line that an accepting and rational person would take. I see no mental disorder in my behaviour or choices.

Last edited by w_ashley on Apr-05-2010 at 04:53

quote:

Originally posted by ******** I can communicate coherently

___________________
**Man I'm Pretty**

quote:

Originally posted by ******** I can communicate coherently...

Oh, really?

quote:

... clear people who are not able to communicate coherently.

How the fuck can someone be "clear" and yet incoherent at the same time?

Also, you have a mental disorder if you think a post was made six minutes after yours when, clearly, timestamps show it to be made forty-eight minutes prior to yours.

quote:

Originally posted by idoru Also, you have a mental disorder if you think a post was made six minutes after yours when, clearly, timestamps show it to be made forty-eight minutes prior to yours.

must be those pesky hackers who are also introducing spelling errors into his posts between his computer and the internet.

___________________
**Man I'm Pretty**

quote:

Originally posted by idoru Oh, really? How the fuck can someone be "clear" and yet incoherent at the same time?

You don't know how to read English do you?


As for the timestamps though you are correct - but this one is easily explained. I looked at the time in the main forum at the time in the right hand column between original and last poster.. not the time at the bottom left.

Why are you so obsessed with finding fault? It is a bad character trait imo.

Just to reiterate you are stupid rude and anal in your behaviour and approaches.

Get off your fucking high horse already jackass.

Clear was a double point reinforcer - it was used to present the two cases

bullshit and people who arn't coherent.

bullshit diagnosis is unfounded based upon stupid doctors
people who arn't coherent diagnosed is based on other factors that may or may not directly mean a loss of self consciousable interaction

What I said was that lots of people arn't issued, doctors use BS to "paint them".

Other cases people are temporarily out of touch due to lack of sleep, lack of food, drugs, etc... it does not mean they have actual disorder that is caused by mental capacity.

That is what I explained by the two cases using clear to preintialize each identity in a logical geometic textual repetition it is called "structures". Sadly if you don't know how to use words or understand them, this is an "intelligence" issue, or due to your own analness depriving your sense of art and meaning in occurence.

Sorry but you are a hater so just fuck off. If you can't try to understand instead of attacking stay the fuck away from me you are a mar.


There is ...

|case 1|
clear bullshit
and
|case 2|
clear people who are not able to communicate coherently.


clear meaning easily recognized.


|case 1|
easily recognized contexts where bullshit
and
|case 2|
easily recognized contexts where people who are not able to communicate coherently.

clear = easily recognized contexts where - it is a transparent case - it is see through.

in this instance

How the fuck does that not make sense to you?
use a fucking dictionary if you don't understand a word
http://www.google.ca/dictionary?lan...lear&hl=en&aq=f
10$ an hour, a real steal - I feel pitty for your inadequacy.



Oh and the final point here is once exposed to multiple lanauages if you can't get contexts without word order being grammatically correct then you are stupid. Structure right need even not sense correctly make to. Much the same as wrods. If you don't understand its not me, its you. Understand that.

I'm suppose to teach language and you are the one who is more anal than myself on the issue. If you can't get it don't worry about it just don't attack me for what doesn't make sense to you. Attacking someone for what makes sense to them, but they don't agree with or feel threatened by is another issue completely and doesn't involve hate of the unknown. Of course communication for resolution and non infringement is always the wiser course because it doesn't earn you the self accumulation of selfish karma. Learning is more than being able to emulate, it involves reception and meaningful use also.

Last edited by w_ashley on Apr-05-2010 at 05:27